Parsing problems with names

From: Paul Carter (pgc104@york.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Mar 23 2000 - 16:59:26 GMT

  • Next message: Sebastian Heid: "bridge grant "final" version"

    Mark,

    There seems to be some problem with parsing monosyllabic proper nouns. We
    hit the problem when trying to synthesise sentences for the testing such
    as:

    she was `born and `trained in `Wales

    but have only just noticed the extent of the issue.

    It appears that some monosyllabic proper nouns are being parsed as WEAK
    even if stress marks (`) are included in the string to be parsed.

    If the proper noun has a homophone, the homophone seems to parse OK.

    eg:

    Doug is wrong dug is OK
    Gene is wrong gene is OK
    Wales is wrong wales is OK
    Mike is wrong mike is OK
    Pearl is wrong pearl is OK
    Flint is wrong flint is OK
    Tyne is wrong tine is OK
    Wear is wrong weir is OK

    However, some proper nouns are wrong, even if there is no homophone (eg
    Brent, Bert, Jake, Joan). Equally, some are right, even if there is a
    homophone (May, may; God, god).

    Interestingly, we have found three other cases where proper nouns are
    correctly parsed:
    pall is OK, as is Paul
    mark is OK, as is Mark
    Jill is OK, but Gill is wrong
    John is OK

    We suspect a bit of jiggery-pokery has been going on here ...

    Love & Kisses,
    John & Paul (George parses OK, but it doesn't know Ringo)

    _ Paul Carter ________________________________________ pgc104@york.ac.uk _
    Dept of Language & Linguistic Science|http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~pgc104/
    University of York |telephone: +44 (0)1904 432660
    Heslington, York. YO10 5DD |fax: +44 (0)1904 432673



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 16:59:46 GMT