The explicit-implicit distinction

From: J L Speranza (jls@netverk.com.ar)
Date: Wed Jan 30 2002 - 09:23:48 GMT

  • Next message: Dan Sperber: "A debate on text-e"

    The topic, and its rationale, fascinated Grice as can be grasped from e.g.
    his discussion of the P.E.R.E. (Principle of Economy of Rational Effort) in
    his 'Reply to Richards', and in the discussion of 'implicit reasoning' in
    _Aspects of Reason_ (Clarendon, 2001).

    Now, the study by R. Carston for UCL, _Pragmatics & the explicit-implicit
    distinction_, is probably the first to deal explicitly with explicitness
    (How's that for a nice pun!)

    This below is what two neurologists (Faulkner & Foster) wrote on the issue
    (explicit/implicit distinction) from a neuro perspective... (Note that
    what's _explicit_ for Faulkner/Foster would be _way_ _implicit_ for, say,
    Witters (Grice's pet name for Wittgenstein).

    Cheers,

    JL

    From Psyche: an interdisciplinary journal of research on consciousness,
    vol. 8. 2002.
    http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v8/psyche-8-02-faulkner.html
    D. Faulkner & J Foster, 'Explicit & implicit processing: insights into the
    neural basis of consciousness'.
    KEYWORDS: explicit, implicit.

    (c) Deborah Faulkner & Jonathan K. Foster 2002.

    "A key element of the distinction between explicit and implicit
    cognitive functioning is the presence or absence of conscious awareness.
    Implications for the conceptualization of cognitive functioning
    are also discussed."

    "A key element of the distinction between explicit and implicit cognitive
    processing is the presence or absence of awareness. (see, for example,
    Young & Block, 1996)."

    "While we acknowledge these proposed distinctions, in this piece we
    choose to refer to explicit knowledge as relating to those aspects of
    cognition which are available to the individual's conscious awareness,
    while - by contrast - implicit processing refers to aspects of cognitive
    functioning which are unavailable to consciousness."
    "Thus, for example, Graf and Schacter (1985) state:
    "implicit memory is revealed when performance on a task is
    facilitated in the absence of conscious recollection; explicit memory is
    revealed when performance on a task requires conscious recollection of
    previous experiences" (p. 501).

    "The methods used to test for the presence of implicit processes differ
    from those used to test explicit functioning. For example, explicit
    memory is typically examined directly, by asking an individual
    deliberately to recall previous events. Implicit memory, on the other
    hand, is typically examined by evaluating performance on tests that
    depend in an indirect way on memory for previous events, as usually
    exemplified by a change in behaviour."

    "Of course, in healthy individuals it is difficult to decouple explicit
    and implicit processing, because the two are usually concomitant and
    operate in (more or less) seamless harmony. One is reminded of Kenneth
    Craik's (1943) famous point, that the better a well-made system
    functions, the less aware we are of its constituent mechanisms and
    processes."

    "Many of the
    capacities referred to in this essay (especially consciousness itself)
    are imbued with language, and it is especially challenging to generalize
    in a clear and valid manner from non-humans to humans where language
    mediation is a potentially important factor. Finally, with respect to
    human research, we acknowledge the contribution of neuroimaging
    studies in the investigation of the mind-brain nexus, because of the
    vast scope of the neuropsychology literature (as well as some concerns
    that have been expressed regarding elements of the neuroimaging
    methodology - such as the use of the subtraction technique)."

    "A critical (and related) conceptual issue concerns whether implicit and
    explicit modes of cognitive processing are - in fact - categorically
    distinct, or whether apparently preserved implicit processing in the
    presence of apparently impaired explicit processing simply represents a
    more degraded modus operandi of the cognitive system as a whole, i.e.
    with "explicit" and "implicit" processes in fact lying on a functional
    continuum."

    "In this essay we consider the implications of proposing a generic
    distinction between implicit and explicit processes for
    our understanding of the architecture of normal cognitive functioning
    and the neural basis of consciousness."

    "One possible confound in the implicit-explicit literature is that
    the tasks used to measure implicit and explicit memory generally require
    different modes of processing. Thus, Roediger (1990) argued that the
    experimental evidence for the existence of implicit ("unaware") and
    explicit ("aware") memory as two distinct memory systems can be
    reinterpreted in terms of the modes of processing involved in the two
    types of task (see Foster & Jelicic, 1999, for a review)."

    "The question remains as to whether
    the implicit/explicit distinction is a valid and useful distinction.
    This issue will now be examined.
    The implications of the findings reviewed in
    the previous sections for the neural basis of consciousness
    are also considered."

    "It is clear from the brief review presented here
    that there is significant evidence for preserved implicit functioning
    across a range of cognitive domains. But does this truly reflect
    preservation of specific qualitatively distinct implicit or
    non-conscious brain "modules" (as would be indicated by the
    demonstration of an implicit/explicit double dissociation) or - rather --
    is it more likely that this represents the preservation of merely
    simpler and less resource-demanding forms of processing?"

    "In other words, does the evidence cited above imply that
    implicit and explicit processing are qualitatively distinct or merely
    quantitatively different?"
     
    "Is there any evidence that the implicit/explicit distinction is
    valid?"

    "Dissociations between implicit and explicit cognition have been
    demonstrated in various modalities in healthy participants."

    "The
    findings of dissociations between explicit and implicit processing
    significantly inform our conceptualisation of
    the cognitive architecture of the mind-brain. Furthermore, these
    demonstrations of the implicit/explicit distinction in healthy
    individuals imply that there is distinct neural
    underpinning for conscious versus nonconscious cognitive processing."

    "So what is the possible neural basis of this distinction?"

    "With respect to other cognitive capacities (such as, for
    example, language or memory), there is evidence for mediation of
    implicit phenomena via complementary cortically-mediated mechanisms."

    "It
    may well be the case that preserved implicit phenomena in neglect are
    also mediated by complementary components of a cortical "attention"
    network."

    "The distinction between implicit and explicit processing is - of course
    - intimately related to the nature of conscious awareness"

    ... or so he authors think.

    After all, as Mandler thought (cited below), consciousness is not only
    probably respectable and useful, but also possibly necessary...

    REFERENCES
    Audet, T., Bub, D., & Lecours A.R. (1991). Visual neglect and left-sided
            context effects. *Brain and Cognition, 16,* 1611-28.
    Baars, B. (1988) *A cognitive theory of consciousness.* New York:
            Cambridge University Press.
    Berti, A., Frassinetti, F., & Umilta, C. (1994). Nonconscious reading?
           *Cortex, 30,* 181-97.
    Blaxton, T.A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures:
            Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework. *Journal of
            Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15,* 657-68.
    Churchland, P.S. & Sejnowski, T.J. (1992) *The computational brain.*
            Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Craik, K. (1943) *The nature of explanation.* Cambridge: Cambridge
            University Press.
    De Haan, E.H.F., Young, A., & Newcombe, F. (1987). Recognition
            without awareness. *Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4,* 385-415.
    Delazer, M., & Benke, T. (1999). Arithmetic reasoning and implicit
            memory. *Brain and Cognition, 40,* 94-7.
    Dennett, D.C. (1991) Consciousness Explained. London: Penguin.
    Doricchi, F., & Galati, G. (2000). Implicit semantic evaluation of
            object symmetry. *Cortex, 36,* 337-50.
    Dunn, J.C. & Kirsner, K. (1989) Implicit memory: Task or process? In S.
            Lewandowsky, J.C. Dunn & K. Kirsner (Eds.) Implicit memory:
            Theoretical issues (pp. 17-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Ellis, A.W. & Young, A.W. (1988) *Human cognitive neuropsychology.* Hove:
            Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Fodor, J. (1983) *The modularity of mind.* Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Foster, J.K. & Jelicic, M. (1999) Memory: Systems, Process or Function?
            Oxford: Oxford Univesity Press.
    Goodale, M.A., Milner, A.D., Jakobson, L.S., & Carey, D.P. (1991). A
            neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping
            them. *Nature, 349,* 154-56.
    Graf, P. & Schacter, D. (1985). Implicit memory for new associations in
            normal subjects. *Journal of Experimental Psychology:
            Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11,* 501-18.
    Graf, P., Squire, L.R., & Mandler, G. (1984). The information that
            amnesic patients do not forget. *Journal of Experimental Psychology:
            Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10,* 164-78.
    Haffenden, A.M., & Goodale, M.A. (1998) The effect of pictorial illusion
            on prehension and perception. *Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10,*
            122-136.
    Hirst, W. (1989) On consciousness, recall, recognition and the
            architecture of memory. In S. Lewandowsky, J.C. Dunn, K. Kirsner
            (Eds) *Implicit memory: Theoretical issues* (pp. 33-46). Hillsdale,
            NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Humphrey, N.K. (1970) What the frog's eye tells the monkey's brain.
            *Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 3,* 324-37.
    Humphrey, N.K. (1972) Seeing and nothingness. *New Scientist, 53,* 682-4.
    Jacoby, L.L., Toth, J.P., & Yonelinas, A.P. (1993). Separating conscious
            and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection.
            *Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122,* 139-54.
    Mandler, G. (1975) Consciousness: Respectable, useful, and probably
            necessary. In R. Solso (Ed.), *Information processing and cognition:
            The Loyola Symposium,* Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
    Marcel, A.J. and Bisiach, E. (Eds.) (1988) *Consciousness in contemporary
            science.* Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
    Marcel, A.J. (1993) The unity of consciousness. In *Ciba
            Foundation Symposium No. 174, Experimental and theoretical studies
            of consciousness.* Chichester, UK: Wiley.
    Milner, A.D. and Rugg, M.D. (Eds.) (1992) *The neuropsychology of
            consciousness.* London: Academic Press.
    Revonsuo, A., & Lainne, M. (1996). Semantic processing without conscious
            understanding *Cortex, 32,* 29-48.
    Roediger, H.L., (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering.
            *American Psychologist, 45,* 1043-54.
    Ross, E.D. & Mesulam, M.M. (1979) Dominant language functions of the
            right hemisphere. *Archives of Neurology, 36,* 144-148.
    Schacter, D.L., McAndrews, M.P. & Moscovitch, M. (1988) Access to
            consciousness: implicit and explicit knowledge.
            In L. Weiskrantz (Ed) *Thought
            without language* (pp 242-78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Shallice, T. (1988) *From neuropsychology to mental structure.* Cambridge,
            UK.: Cambridge University Press.
    Sperry, R.W. (1984) Consciousness & personal identity.
            *Neuropsychologia, 22,* 661-673.
    Tranel, D., & Damasio, A.R. (1988). Knowledge without awareness.
            *Science, 228,* 1453-54.
    Walsh, K, & Darby, D. (1999). *Neuropsychology*. (4th
            ed.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
    Warrington, E.K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1970). Amnesic syndrome:
            Consolidation or retrieval? *Nature, 228,* 628-30.
    Weiller, C. (1998) Imaging recovery from stroke. *Experimental Brain
            Research, 123,* 13-17.
    Weiskrantz, L. (1986) *Blindsight.* Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Weiskrantz, L. (1990). Outlooks for blindsight: Explicit methodologies
            for implicit processes. *Proceedings of the Royal Society of London,
            B, 239,* 247-78.
    Winner, E. & Gardner, H. (1977) The comprehension of metaphor.
            *Brain, 100,* 717-729.
    Young, A.W. & Block, N (1996) Consciousness. In Implicit memory: Task or
            process? In V. Bruce (Ed.) *Unsolved mysteries of the mind: tutorial
            essays* (pp 149-79). Hove, East Sussex: Erlbaum (UK) Taylor &
            Francis.
    Zajonc, R.B. (1980) Feeling and thinking: preferences need no
            inferences. *American Psychologist, 35,* 151-75.

    ==
                            J L Speranza, Esq
    Country Town
    St Michael's Hall Suite 5/8
    Calle 58, No 611 Calle Arenales 2021
    La Plata CP 1900 Recoleta CP 1124
    Tel 00541148241050 Tel 00542214257817
                          BUENOS AIRES, Argentina
                           Telefax 00542214259205
                       http://www.netverk.com.ar/~jls/
                            jls@netverk.com.ar



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 30 2002 - 10:48:46 GMT