Quasi-Belief, the Oratio Recta/Obliqua Distinction, & RT

From: J L Speranza (jls@netverk.com.ar)
Date: Wed Feb 21 2001 - 21:20:28 GMT

  • Next message: Marjolein Groefsema: "Modified Programme LAGB Spring Meeting"

    As is typical with "The Linguist", they have just distributed an alternative
    review, this time by A. Bezuidenhout (LINGUIST 12.481), which is more
    explicit as to the interface with RT.
    Best,
    JL.
    ====

    Bezuindenhout writes: "Recanati proposes a way of dealing with cases which
    he calls strongly deviant non-cumulative echoes. The strongly deviant cases
    can be handled by appeal to a deferential operator. Ultimately though
    Recanati wants a unified account of all cases of mixed quotation (i.e., of
    echoic uses inside the object-representation of a metarepresentation). He
    finally offers an account of all such echoes (cumulative and non-cumulative,
    strongly deviant and weakly deviant) in terms of a deferential operator

                   D x,m [S]

    where 'S' is an expression of a language, 'x' the person to whom we defer
    and 'm' is a way of using that expression. I will not summarize the
    discussion here as it is rather intricate. It takes a detour through an
    examination of the notion of deference, and of Sperber's notion of

           "quasi-belief".".

    "Refs. Sperber, D. (1975). Rethinking Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge
    University Press. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication
    and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell."



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 21 2001 - 21:20:04 GMT