forwarded message

From: robyn carston (robyn@linguistics.ucl.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Apr 19 2000 - 11:16:42 GMT

  • Next message: Barbara MacMahon: "spreading activation"

    Message from David Keeble, on 'spreading activation'.

    >Dear all,
    >For some time now I have been interested the vast array of
    >connections between textual expressions that need to be
    >made by readers in comprehending a piece of literature being read.
    >
    >I have come across the expression "spreading activation" in the
    >cognitive and functional literature on text comprehension, for
    >example in Giv=F3n (1993) 'The grammar of referential coherence as
    >mental processing instructions' _Language_ vol 30-1 and in
    >Kintsch (1998) _Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition_CUP.
    >This notion seems to me to be envisaged as an automatic response to
    >a cue (a word or phrase, for example, in a text) that activates nodes
    >(concepts or propositions) in a knowledge network that is created
    >=66rom the "text base" and other contextual knowledge as a
    >representation of the text. This activation seems to be dependent
    >more on the putative general architecture of memory than on any
    >pragmatic or infernential process, and more specifically on what
    >Kintsch calls "retrieval structures" (specialized schemas created for
    >fast recall from long term memory in specific domains - we are all
    >supposed to be specialists in text processing , within certain
    >general domains).
    >What puzzles me about this "Comprehension Integration" model of
    >Kintsch's, in which this general idea of 'spreading activation'
    >operates, is that there seems to be no need for any searching
    >(certainly no mention of it) or any strategy or criterion for
    >decision making (like relevance) between alternative,
    >equally or competingly activated nodes - assuming they arise. Does
    >anyone know much about this model and understand it better than I
    >do and whether it works in the way I have represented it? or about
    >similar models and the way they work? Is anyone interested in this
    >issue? Can anyone shed any light on what, to me, is an anomaly?
    >
    >Cordially,
    >
    >David Keeble
    >Communication Studies,
    >Middlesex University,
    >White Hart Lane,
    >London N17 8HR
    >
    >
    >

    -------------------------------------------------
    Robyn Carston
    Department of Phonetics & Linguistics, UCL
    Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
    Tel 020 7679 3174
    Fax 020 7383 4108
    URL http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/robyn/home.htm
    -------------------------------------------------



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 19 2000 - 11:31:33 GMT