Bibliography (N - Z)

Note to all users: Papers with links (underlined) are available on the web.

Neisser, U. (ed). 1987. Concepts and Conceptual Development, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Nicolle, S. & Clark, B. 1999. Experimental pragmatics and what is said: A response to Gibbs and Moise. Cognition 69, 337-354. (PDF)

Nogales, P. 1999. Metaphorically Speaking. CSLI/Cambridge University Press, Stanford.

Noh, E-J. 2000. Metarepresentation: A Relevance Theory Approach. Revised version of Noh (1998). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Noveck, I. A., Bianco, M. & Castry, A. 2001. The costs and benefits of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(1&2), 109-121. (PDF)

Nunberg, G. 1978. The Pragmatics of Reference. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.

Nunberg, G. 1995. Transfers of Meaning. Journal of Semantics 12, 109-132.

Nunberg, G., Sag, I. and Wasow, T. 1994. Idioms. Language 70 (3): 491-538.

Onifer, W. and Swinney, DA. 1981 Accessing lexical ambiguities ... sentence comprehension: effects of frequency of meaning and context bias. Memory and Cognition 9, 225-236

Onishi, K. and Gregory, M. 1993. Metaphoric reference: when metaphors are understood as easily as literal expressions. Memory and Cognition 21:6 763-772

Origgi G. & Sperber, D. 2000. Evolution, communication and the proper function of language. To appear in P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (eds) Evolution and the human mind: Language, modularity and social cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 140-169. (PDF)

Ortony, A. (ed.) 1993. Metaphor and Thought. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Ortony, A. 1979. Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review, 86: 1671-180.

Ortony, A. 1980. Some psycholinguistic aspects of metaphor. In Honeck, R.& Hoffman, R. (eds.) Cognition and Figurative Language. 69-86. New Jersey: Lawrence.

Ortony, A. 1984 Understanding figurative language In D Pearson (ed) Handbook of reading research 16, 417-441

Ortony, A. 1993. Metaphor, language and thought. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. Second edition. New York: Cambridge University Press

Ortony, A., Schallert, D., Reynolds, R. and Antos, S. 1978. Interpreting metaphors and idioms: some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 17: 465-477.

Paivio, A. (1990) Dual coding theory. In Paivio, A. Mental Representations: a Dual Coding Approach. Oxford Psychology Series 9. Oxford Science Publications: Oxford.

Papafragou, A. 1995. Metonymy and relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 141-175. (PDF)

Papafragou, A. 1996a. Figurative language and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Language and Literature 5, 179-93.(PDF)

Papafragou, A. 1996b. On metonymy. Lingua 99: 169-195. (PDF)

Papafragou, A. 1998a. Experience and concept attainment: Some critical remarks. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 109-141. (PDF)

Papafragou, A. 1998b. Inference and word meaning: The case of modal auxiliaries. Lingua 105, 1-47. (PDF)

Papafragou, A. 2000. Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface.Amsterdam/New York: Elsevier Science

Partee, B. 1995. Lexical semantics and compositionality. In L. Gleitman and M. Liberman (eds.) An Introduction to Cognitive Science, vol.1: LangaugeI, 311-360. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.

Peterson, P. and Burgess, C. 1993. Syntactic and semantic processing during idiom comprehension: neurolinguistic and psycholinguistic dissociations. In C. Cacciari and P. Tabossi. (eds.) Idioms: Processing, Structure, and Interpretation. 201-225. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

Pilkington, A. 2000. Metaphor. Chapter 4 of. Pilkington, A. Poetic Effects: a Relevance Theory Perspective. 85-121. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Pilkington, A. 2000. Poetic Effects: a Relevance Theory Perspective. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Pilkington, A. 1992. Poetic effects. Lingua 87, 29-51.

Pilkington, A. 1994. Poetic Thoughts and Poetic Effects: A Relevance Theory
Account of the Literary Use of Rhetorical Tropes and Schemes. PhD thesis, University of London.

Pilkington, Adrian. 1990 A relevance theoretic view of metaphor. Parlance 2: 102-117.

Posner, M.I., and Snyder, C.R. 1975. Attention and cognitive control. In R.L. Solso (ed.) Information Processing and Cognition: the Loyola Symposium. 55-85. Lawerence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Pustejovsky, J. 1998. Generativity and explanation in semantics: a reply to Fodor and Lepore. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 289-311.

Pustejovsky, J. and Boguraev, B. 1995. Introduction: Lexical semantics in context. Journal of Semantics 12: 1-14.

Putnam, H. 1975. the meaning of “meaning”. In Mind, Language and Reality. Vol2. Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: CUP.

Ratcliff, R & McKoon, G 1986 Automatic activation of episodic information in a semantic memory task. Journal of experimental Psychology: learning, memory and Cognition 12, 108-115 (PDF)

Ratcliff, R. and McKoon, G. 1981. Does activation really spread? Psychological Review 88: 454-462.

Ratneschwar, S., Barsalou, L.W., Pechmann, C. & Moore, M. 2001. Goal derived categories: The role of personal and situational goals in category representation. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 147-157. (PDF)

Ravin, Y. and C. Leacock. 2000. Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Recanati, F. 1989. The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language 4, 295-329.

Recanati, F. 1995. The alleged priority of literal interpretation. Cognitive Science 19: 207-232.(PDF)

Recanati, F. 2002. The limits of expressibility. In B. Smith (ed.) John Searle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.(PDF)

Recanati, F. 2003. Contextualism: how far can we go? Chapter 9 of Recanati, F. Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Recanati, F. 2003. Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.(PDF)

Recanati, F. 2001. What is said. Synthese 128: 75-91.(PDF)

Recanati, F. 2002. Does linguistic communication rest on inference? Mind and Language 17 (1&2) 105-126 (PDF)

Reddy, M. 1979. The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.). Metaphor and Thought. 224-324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reimer, M. 1998. What is meant by “what is said”?: A reply to Cappelen and Lepore. Mind and Language 13, 598-604.

Richards, I.A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford University Press, London.

Riechmann, P. & Coste, E. 1980. Mental imagery and the comprehension of figurative language: is there a relationship? In R. Honeck & R. Hoffman. Cognition and Figurative Language. 183-200. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Rips, Lance J., 1995. The current status of research on concept combination. Mind and Language 10: 72-104.

Rips, nce J. 1989. Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Voniadou & A. Ortony (eds.). Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. 21-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ritchie, D. 2003. Categories and similarities: a note on circularity. Metaphor and Symbol 18(1): 49-53.

Ritchie, D. 2004. Metaphors in Conversational Context: Toward a Connectivity Theory of Metaphor Interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 19: 265-287.(PDF)

Rosch, E. 1978. Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. Lloyd (eds.) Cognition and Categorization. 28-46. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.

Rosch. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories

Roth, E.M. & Shoben, E.J. 1983. The effect of context on the structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 15 346-378.

Rubio Fernández, P. ¿? Understanding nominal metaphors: beyond class inclusion

Rubio Fernandez, P. 2001. Inhibition of core features in metaphor interpretation. RCEAL Working Papers, Cambridge, Research Centre in English and Applied Linguistics.(PDF)

Rubio Fernández, P. 2005. Cognitive Mechanism and Pragmatic Processes in Lexical Interpretation: the On-line Construction of Concepts. PhD Thesis. Cambridge University.

Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. 1997 Cognitive and pragmatic aspects of metonymy. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 6-2: 161-178.

Rumelhart, D. 1979/1993. Some problems with the notion of literal meanings. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. 71-82. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Sadock, J. 1974. Distinguishing Use from Meaning. In Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. Academic Press, INC. New York 97-109

Sadock, J. 1978. On testing for conversational implicature. in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 9: Pragmatics, Academic Press, pp. 281-297.

Sadock, J. M. 1972. Speech act idioms. In P. M. Peranteau, J. N. Levi, and G. C. Phares (eds.). Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 329-339. University of Chicago, Chicago.

Sadock, J.M. 1993. Figurative speech and linguistics. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. (2 Ed.) 42-57. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sandford, 2002. Context, attention, and depth of processing during interpretation. Mind & Language 17: 188-206 (PDF)

Sandford, A and Sturt, P. 2002. Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive sciences 6 (9): 382-386.(PDF)

Saussure, F. de. 1975. Course in General Linguistics, translated from the French (1916) by Wade Baskin. Peter Owen, London.

Schenider, W. and Chein, J. 2003. Controlled and automatic processing: behaviour, theory and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science 27: 525-559.(PDF)

Schneider, W. and Shiffrin, R. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I detection, search and attention. Psychological Review 84: 1-66.

Searle, J. 1979a. Literal meaning. In J. Searle. Expression and Meaning. 117-136. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Searle, J. 1979b. Metaphor. In Searle, J. 1979. Expression and Meaning. 137-161. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Searle, J. 1980. The background of meaning. In J. Searle et al. (eds.) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. 221-232. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Netherlands.

Seuren, P. ?? Lexical meaning and metaphor. Cognition in Language Use. Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, 422-431

Shen, Y,. 1987. On the structure and understanding of poetic oxymoron. Poetics Today 8, 105-122.

Shen, Y. 1999. Principles of metaphor interpretation and the notion of ‘domain’: a proposal for a hybrid model. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1631-1653 (PDF)

Shiffrin, R.M., and Schneider, W. 1977. Controlled and automatic information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84: 127-190.

Shore, W. J. and V. Kempe. 1999. The Role of Sentence Context in Accessing Partial Knowledge of Word Meanings”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol. 28, Nº 2, pp. 145-163.

Smith, E. and Medin, D. 1981. Categories and Concepts. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Smith, L and Samuelson, L. 1997. Perceiving and remembering: category stability, variability and development. In K. Lamberts and D. Shanks (eds.) 1997. Knowledge, Concepts and Categories. 161-196. Psychology Press, Hove, UK.

Smith, S.M., Ward, T.B. and Finke, R.A. (eds.) 1995. The Creative Cognition Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Song, N.S. 1998. Metaphor and metonymy. In: Relevance Theory. Applications and Implications. Eds. R. Carston and S. Uchida. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 87-104.

Sperber, D. 1982. Apparently irrational beliefs. In S. Lukes and M. Hollis (eds.) Rationality and Relativism. 149-180. Blackwell, Oxford.

Sperber, D. 1989. Lecture on Relevance and Word Meaning, Relevance Theory Workshop, University of Essex.

Sperber, D. 1990. The epidemiology of beliefs. In C. Fraser and G. Gaskell (eds.). The Social Psychological Study of Widespread Beliefs. 25-44. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Sperber, D. 1994a. The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In L. Hirschfield and S. Gelman (eds.) Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. 39-67. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Sperber, D. 1994b. Understanding verbal understanding. In J. Khalfa. What is Intelligence? 179-198. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.(PDF)

Sperber, D. 1996. Explaining Culture: a Naturalistic Approach. Blackwell, Oxford.

Sperber, D. 1997. Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind and Language 12: 67-83. (PDF)

Sperber, D. 2000. Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In D. Sperber Metarepresentations: an Interdisciplinary Perspective. 117-137. New York, Oxford University Press.(PDF)

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1983. Draft of Relevance, chapter 8, ms. Department of Linguistics, University College London.

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1986/1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford.

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1987. Précis of Relevance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4): 697-710.

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1990. Rhetoric and relevance. In J. Bender and D. Wellbery. The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice. 140-155. Stanford University Press, Stanford.(PDF)

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1991. Loose talk. In S. Davis (ed.) Pragmatics: a Reader. 540-549. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1998. The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. In P. Carruthers and J. Boucher (eds.) Thought and Language. 184-200. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.(PDF)

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 2002. Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind and Language 17(1/2): 3-23.(PDF)

Sperber, D. Forthcoming. Modularity and relevance: how can a massively modular mind be flexible and context-sensitive? To appear in P. Carruthers, S. Laurence and S. Stich (eds.) The Innate Mind: Structure and Content. (PDF)

Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre. Forthcoming. Pragmatics. In F. Jackson and M. Smith (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Analytic Philosophy. OUP, Oxford, 468-501(PDF)

Springer, K and Murphy GL. 1992. Feature availability in conceptual combination. Psychological Science 3: 111-117

Srull, T.K. and Wyer R.S. 1979. The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 1660-1662.

Stefanowitsch, A. and Gries, S. (Ed.) Forthcoming. Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 171). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Sternberg, R. (ed.) 1999. Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Strässler, J. 1982. Conclusions in Idioms in English: a Pragmatic Analysis. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

Stroop, J.P. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18: 643-662.

Sweetser, Eve 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: The Mind-Body Metaphor in Semenatic Structure and Semantic Change. Cambridge UP, Cambridge.

Swinney, D. 1979. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (re) consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 18: 645-659.(PDF)

Tabossi, P, Colombo, L & Job, R. 1987. Accessing lexical ambiguity: effects of context and dominance Psychological research 49, 161-167

Tabossi, P. 1988. Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts. Journal of memory and language 27, 324-340

Tabossi, P. 1991. Understanding words in context. In: G.B. Simpson (ed.) Understanding Word and Sentence. 1-22. North-Holland: Elsevier Science.

Tabossi, P. 1993. Processing Ambiguous Words in Context. Journal of Memory and Language, nº 32, pp. 359-372.

Tabossi, P. and Zardon, F. 1993. The activation of idiomatic meaning in spoken language comprehension. In C. Cacciari and P. Tabossi. (eds.) Idioms: Structure, Processing and Interpretation. 145-162. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

Tendahl, M. 2004. Cognitive effects and effort in a comprehensive theory of metaphor. Paper presented at Mind, Language and Metaphor conference. Granada, Spain

Thomson, D. and Tulving, E. 1970. Associative encoding and retrieval weak and strong cues. Journal of experimental psychology vol. 86:255-262.

Titone, D. and Connine, C. 1994. The comprehension of idiomatic expressions: Effects of predictability and literality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20(5): 1126-1138.

Titone, D. and Connine, C. 1999. On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 31(3): 1655-1674.(PDF)

Tourangeau, R. and Rips, L. 1991. Interpreting and evaluating metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language 30: 452-472.

Tourangeau, R. and Sternberg, R. 1981. Aptness in metaphor. Cognitive Psychology, 13: 27-55.

Tourangeau, R. and Sternberg, R. 1982. Understanding and appreciating metaphors. Cognition11: 203-244.

Traugott, EC 1985 “Conventional” and “dead” metaphors In W Paprotte, & driven (eds) The ubiquity of metaphor 17-56 Amsterdam, John Benhamins

Travis, C. 1985. On what is strictly speaking true. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15: 187-229.

Tulving, E. 1979. Relations between encoding specificity and levels of processing. In L. Cermark and F. Craik (eds.) Levels of Processing in Human Memory. 405-428. Hillsdale, New Jersey.

Tulving, E. 1983. Elements of Episodic Memory. Oxford University Press, New York.

Tulving, E. 2001. Does memory encoding exists? In M. Naveh-Benjamin, M. Moscovitch, & h. roediger (eds.) Perspectives on Human Memory and Cognitive Aging: Essays in Honour of Fergus Craik. 6-27. New York: Psychology Press.

Tulving, E. and Thomson, D. 1973. Encoding Specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review 80: 352-373.

Turner, M. 1987. Death is the Mother of Beauty. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.

Turner, N. 1998. Figure. In N. Katz,C. Cacciari, R. Gibbs, M. Turner. 1998. Figurative Language and Thought. 44-87. New York, Oxford University Press.

Tvesky, A. 1977. Features of similarity. Psychological Preview, 84: 327-352.

Unger, C. 1996. Proverbs and Relevance. Unpublished manuscript

Utsumi, A. 2005. The role of feature emergence in metaphor appreciation. Metaphor and Symbol 20 (3): 151-172.(PDF)

Valle-Tourangeau, Anthony et al 1998 Strategies for generating multiple instances of common and ad hoc categories

Van de Voort, M. and Vonk, W. 1995. You don’t die immediately when you kick and empty bucket: a processing view on semantic and syntactic characteristic of idioms. In M. Everaert et al. (eds.) Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives. 283-300. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.

Van Lancker, D. and Canter, G.J. 1981. Idiomatic versus literal interpretations of ditropically ambiguous sentences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 24: 64-69.

Van Oostendorp, H. & de Mul, S. 1990. Moses beats Adam: a semantic relatedness effect on a semantic illusion. Acta psychologica 74: 35-46

van Rooy, R. 2001. Relevance of communicative acts. To appear in Proceedings of Tark 2001

van Rooy, R. 2000. Decision problems in pragmatics. Ms. ILLC, Amsterdam.

Veale, T. 1999. Pragmatic forces in metaphor use: the mechanism of blend recruitment in visual metaphors. In C. Nehaniv (ed.) Computation for Metaphors, Ananlogy, and Agents. 37-51. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

Vega Moreno, R. 2001. Representing and processing idioms, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 13.(PDF)

Vega Moreno, R. 2003. Relevance Theory and the construction of idiom meaning. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 83-104.(PDF)

Vega Moreno, R. 2004. Metaphor interpretation and emergence. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 197-322.(PDF)

Vega Moreno, R. 2005. Idioms, transparency and pragmatic inference. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 17

Verschueren, Jef, Jan-Ola Ostman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen, eds. (1997), Handbook of Pragmatics Online, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.

Vicente, B. 1992. Metaphor, meaning and comprehension. Pragmatics 2: 49-62.

Vicente, B. 1993. En torno a la semántica y la pragmática de la metáfora: una revisión crítica. Pragmalingüística, 1: 307-334.

Vicente, B. 1995. Mecanismos Semántico-Pragmáticos en el Análisis de la Metáfora. Universidad del País Vasco, Servicio de Publicaciones, País Vasco.

Vicente, B. 1995. Metaphoric Combinations and the Structure of Concepts”. In Memoriam HENRY SWEET. (pp. 183-190) A. Leon Sendra & V. Lopez Folgado (Eds.).Córdoba: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Córdoba.

Vicente, B. 1996. On the semantics and pragmatics of metaphor: coming full circle. Language and Literature 5: 195-208.

Vosniadou, S. and Ortony, A. 1989. Similarity and analogical reasoning: a synthesis. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. New York, Cambridge University Press.

Ward, T., Smith, S. and Vaid, J. (eds.) 1997. Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structure and Processes. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

Ward, T.B., Finke, R.A. & Smith, SM: 1995. Creativity and the Mind: Discovering the Genius Within. New York: Plenum. ?

Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M., Finke, R.A. 1999 Creative Cognition, in Handbook of creativity, Sternberg, R.J., ed, Cambridge, U.K. : Cambridge University Press.(PDF)

Ward, Thomas. B., Smith, Steven. M. & Vaid, Jyotsna. 1997. Conceptual structures and processes in creative thought In

Ward, T. B. Et al. (eds.). 1997. Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Wasow, T., Sag, I. and Nunberg, G. 1983. Idioms: an interim report. In S. Hattori, K. Inoue (eds.) Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguistics, Tokyo.

Wharton, T. 2004. Lexical acquisition and pragmatics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 323-342.

Williamson, T. 1994. Vagueness. Routledge, London.

Wilson, D. 1995. Is there a maxim of truthfulness? UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 197-212. (PDF)

Wilson, D. 1996. Pragmatics. Entry in A. Kuper & J. Kuper (eds) The Social Science Encyclopedia 2nd Edition. Routledge, London: 661-2.(PDF)

Wilson, D. 1998. Discourse, coherence and relevance: A reply to Rachel Giora. Journal of Pragmatics 29: 57-74.(PDF)

Wilson, D. 1998. Linguistic structure and inferential communication. In B. Caron (ed.) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists. Elsevier Sciences, Oxford.(PDF)

Wilson, D. 1999. Relevance and Relevance Theory. Entry in R. Wilson & F. Keil (eds) MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 719-22.(PDF)

Wilson, D. 2000. Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. In D. Sperber (ed.) Metarepresentations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 411-448. Version (pdf) published in (1999) UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 127-161(PDF)

Wilson, D. 2002. Relevance Theory: from the basics to the cutting edge. ICU Open lectures on cognitive pragmatics. ICU, Japan.

Wilson, D. 2003. Relevance Theory and Lexical Pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica, 15(2): 273-291. Special Issue on Pragmatics and the Lexicon. Reprinted in 2004 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16 (PDF)

Wilson, D. 2004-2005 Concepts. Philosophy of Language/Issues in Pragmatics lectures, Department of Linguistics, University College London.

Wilson, D. 2005. New directions for research on pragmatics and modularity. Lingua 115: 1129- 1146. Ealier published in 2003 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 105-127. Download (PDF)

Wilson, D. and Matsui, T. 1998. Recent approaches to bridging: Truth, coherence and relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 173-200.(PDF)

Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90, 1-2. Special Issue on Relevance Theory, vol 2: 1-25. Version published in (1990) UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 95-112 (PDF)

Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1981. On Grice’s theory of conversation. In P. Werth (ed.) Conversation and Discourse. 155-178. Croom Helm, London.

Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1985. On choosing the context for utterance interpretation. In J. Allwood and E. Hjelmquist (ed.) Foregrounding Background. 51-64. Bokforlaget Doxa AB, Lund, Sweden.

Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1990. Outline of Relevance Theory. Hermes 5: 35-56.

Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1998. Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. In A. Kasher (ed.) Pragmatics: Critical concepts. Vol. II. Routledge, London: 262-289.(PDF)

Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1998. Pragmatics and time. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (eds) Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. John Benjamins: 1-22. (PDF)

Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2002. Truthfulness and Relevance. Mind 111: 583-632. Version (pdf) published in (2000) UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 215- 254.(PDF)

Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2004. Relevance Theory. In G. Ward and L. Horn (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 607-632. Longer earlier version (pdf) published in 2002 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 249-287 (PDF)

Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan. 2005. Reply to Rajagopalan. Intercultural Pragmatics 1: 99-103.(PDF)

Wilson, Deirdre and Wharton, Tim. Forthcoming. Relevance and Prosody. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 17(PDF)

Winner, 1988. The Point of Words: Children’s Understanding of Metaphor and Irony. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

Wisniewski, E.J. 1996. Construal and similarity in concept combination. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 434-45.

Wisniewski, E.J. 1997. Conceptual combination: possibilities and aesthetics. In T. Ward, S. Smith & J. Vaid (Eds.) Creative Thought: an Investigation of conceptual structures and Processes. 51-81. Washington D.C.: Americal Psychological Association.

Wisniewski, E.J. 1997. When concepts combine. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4, 167-183

Wisniewski, E.J. and Love, B. 1998. Relations versus properties in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language 38: 177-202. (PDF)

Wisniewski, EJ. And Gentner, D. 1991. On the combinatorial semantics of noun pairs: minor and major adjustments to meaning. In G.B. Simpson (ed.) Understanding Word and Sentence. Elsevier Science Publishers, North Holland.

Wolff, P. and Gentner, D. 2000. Evidence for the role-neutral initial processing of metaphor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 26: 529-541.(PDF)

Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Wray, A. 2002. The Whole and the Parts. Chapter 1 in Wray Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.