> I'm sorry that Mark can't come on 6 Nov, but I think, in the circs, that
> he's right to suggest we should go ahead without him. Maybe, if necessary,
> he could join all or part of the RA's meeting, which I understand is
> likely to go ahead when Jana is back to full strength.
Apologies if I've lost track of the discussion. I was under the
impression that we were now talking about meeting over two or three days
with one day as a normal management meeting and the other day(s) for RAs
and anyone else who wanted to be involved (particularly Richard and
Sarah?).
Is it the case that we're now agreeing on 6 Nov as a single-day management
meeting with 19/20/21 Nov as the possible time for a later RA meeting? Or
are we going for 4/5/6 Nov for everything?
In confusion,
Paul