Note: I (Sarah) *think/hope* that this convention has an added advantage:
you can of course get voiced and then voiceless /z/, for example. On
current criteria, these should be marked z ...... z_0. (not z_v ......
z_0 , because z implies voiced). If the end of the phone is the rightmost
label (with proviso (ii) above), then using z ..... z_0 is not a problem.
(It is a problem if z means end of phone, as well as voiced.)
However, others may disagree, and if enough do, then we should adopt the
other solution (that a single phone always means end of phone, if there is
no single phone, follow (i) and (ii) above, and things like partially
devoiced frics are marked z_v ..... z_0).
Opinions?
In other cases, if (say) a voiced
> fricative actually *is* both voiced and fricative throughout, can we simply
> give it the default label and not worry about sub-segments?
yes
> When marking stop-closures, do you want "tc" or "t_c" (instructions have
> both)? Dead trivial but we might as well be consistent.
sorry: t_c is correct
> When we've done the files we're all doing, I'd like to be able to compare
> notes before we embark on the UCL-only ones.
good idea
hope this helps
Sarah
______________________________________________________________________
Dr. Sarah Hawkins Email: sh110@cam.ac.uk
Dept. of Linguistics Phone: +44 1223 33 50 52
University of Cambridge Fax: +44 1223 33 50 53
Sidgwick Avenue or +44 1223 33 50 62
Cambridge CB3 9DA
United Kingdom