Re: Hierarchical Annotation Proposals

alex@phonetics.ucl.ac.uk
Mon, 06 Oct 1997 13:27:02 +0100

At 12:12 PM 2/10/97 +0100, Mark Huckvale wrote:

>9 Annotation and signal generation modules
>
> Modules are required for at least:
>  Syntactic parse
>  Prosodic parse
>  Temporal model
>  Intonational model
>  Segmental model
>  F0 generation
>  Resynthesis
>
> Since we probably need to establish a strict sequence to
> the application of modules, it may be necessary to sub-
> divide modules to ensure cross-information is available at
> the right time as synthesis proceeds.

Since all transcribed units will be anchored to their temporal location and
thus have a unique reference, I feel that the above modules can be applied
separately and independently, which means that in the end we end up with
several versions of the same transcription. The synthesis module will decide
which version to use at which particular time. This should save us the
trouble to align or integrate annotations at the above levels.

I've put up my web pages about the formal grammar, which describes the
linguistic string at wordclass, phrase, and clause levels. Please have a
look and then comment and suggest. The address is:

http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/alex/project/parsing/parsing.htm

Alex