Re: VERY URGENT: esp Mark H & John

From: Mark Huckvale (M.Huckvale@ucl.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Nov 24 2000 - 16:26:18 GMT

  • Next message: Sarah Hawkins: "EVEN MORE URGENT: esp Mark H & John"

    At 15:23 24/11/00 +0000, you wrote:
    > Below is a text mainly written by Mark W. It basically asks "is it
    >worthwhile to rewrite Pro(c)sy?"

    I don't see any sensible alternative to writing PROSY in ProXML
    at the moment. The alternatives are to stick with Python which
    doesn't integrate with our XML structure very well, or to switch
    to a third different scripting language.

    I think there is a debate about whether it is worth while making
    PROCSY "stand alone" so that you wouldn't need to use ProSynth
    prosodic structures:- it might be useful for other people working
    in speech perception.

    I would like to hear someone describe what the disadvantages of
    changing to ProXML are.

    Mark

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 24 2000 - 16:25:23 GMT