Dear All,
I am thinking of reframing pragmatic anaphora in terms of relevance
theory. But I shall do this especially in terms of the de se vs. de re
distinction.
My paper for Rask on Barack Obama is almost ready. It incorporates a
suggestion by Dan Sperber. A copy is in www.semantics.archive.net.
Can anyone send me the following papers:
Sarah Blackwell
2000 Anaphora interpretation in Spanish J of Pragmatics 2000 32, 4
2001 Testing the neo-gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora J Pragmatics
2001 33/6
Thanks so much.
Received on Fri Feb 15 12:30:55 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 15 2008 - 12:43:27 GMT