Note to all users: Papers with links (underlined) are available on the web. Many would
require a subscription to the journal. They are all accessible from UCL
computers.
Note to all UCL users: Please note that on occasions it is not possible to make a direct link to
the articles. In these cases, I have made the link to the table of contents of
the journal or to the UCL library. If I have added the link it is because the
article is available from a UCL computer. Note also that although papers
accessible via Ovid appear on the screen on html form, you generally have the
option (on the right) to download the article in PDF.
Note to members of the
project: Hard copies of the papers in (blue) bold are
available from the project library (in the hut). Papers are in alphabetical order.
Some papers include a link to summaries and comments made by the members of the
project (in capitals)
Aitchison,
J. 1994. Words in the Mind: an Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Blackwell,
Allott, N. and Rubio
Fernández, P. 2002. This paper fills a much-needed gap. In
P. Afuta, A. El Ghali and F. Toussenel (eds.) The Proceedings of the Atelier
des Den Linguistique. Universite Paris, Paris.
Anderson,
J. 1980/2000. Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. Fifth Edition.
Worth Publishers,
Anderson, R. and Ortony, A. 1975. On putting apples into bottles: a
problem of polysemy. Cognitive Psychology 7: 167-180.
Ariel, M.
2002.The
demise of a unique concept of literal meaning. Journal of Pragmatics
34: 361-402.
Ashby, M. Forthcoming. Prosody and idioms in English.
Paper revised and resubmitted to Journal of Pragmatics.
Asher, N.
and Lascarides, A. 1995. Lexical disambiguation
in a discourse context. Journal of Semantics 12: 69-108
Asher, N.
and Lascarides, A. 2001 The
semantics and pragmatics of metaphor. In P. Bouillon and F. Busa (eds.) The
Language of Word Meaning. 262-289.
Atlas, J.
2005. Logic, Meaning, and Conversation: Semantical Underdeterminacy,
Implicature, and their Interface.
Bach, K.
1994. Conversational
impliciture. Mind and Language 9: 124-62.
Bach, K. 1995.
Standarization vs. Conventionalization. Linguistics and Philosophy 18:
677-686.
Bach, K. 1995b/1998. Standarization
revisited. In A. Kasher (ed.) Pragmatics: Critical Concepts. Vol IV: 712-722.
Routedge,
Bach, K. 1997. The
semantics-pragmatics distinction: what it is and why it matters. Linguistische
Berichte 8: 33-50. Special Issue on Pragmatics.
Bach, K. 1999. The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327-366.
Bach, K. 2001. Speaking loosely: sentence nonliteraily. In P. French and H. Wettstein (eds.) Midwest Studies in Philosophy: Figurative Language vol 25: 249-263.. Blackwell Publishers.
Bach, K.
and Harnish, R. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. MIT
Press,
Baddeley, A. 1978. The
trouble with levels: a reexamination of Craik and Lockhart’s framework for
memory research. Psychological Review 85 (3): 139-153.
Baddeley,
A. 1997 (ed.) Human Memory: Theory and Practise. Psychology Press,
Barclay,
J.R., Bransford, J.D., Franks, J.J,
Barsalou,
L.W. 1981. Determinants of graded structure in categories. Dissertation,
Barsalou, L.W. 1982. Context-independent and context-dependent information
in concepts. Memory and Cognition 10: 82-93.
Barsalou,
L.W. 1983. Ad
hoc categories. Memory and
Cognition 11: 211-227.
Barsalou,
L.W. 1985. Ideals,
central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded
structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition 11: 629-654.
Barsalou, L.W. 1987. The
instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts.
In U. Neisser (ed.) Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and
Intellectual Factors in Categorization. 101-140.
Barsalou, L.W. 1989. Intraconcept similarity and its implications for
interconcept similarity. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.) Similarity
and Analogical Reasoning. 76-121.
Barsalou, L.W. 1989. Systematicity and semantic
ambiguity. In D. Gorfein (ed.) Resolving Semantic Ambiguity. 146-203.
Barsalou, L.W. 1990. Access and inference in
categorization. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28: 268-271.
Barsalou, L.W. 1990. On
the indistinguishablility of exemplar memory and abstraction in category
representation. In T.K. Srull and R.S: Wyer (eds.) Advances in Social
Cognition. Volume II: Content and Process Specificity in the Effects of
Prior Experiences. 61-88. Lawernce Erlbaum Associates,
Barsalou, L.W. 1991. Deriving
categories to achieve goals. In G. Bower (ed.) The Psychology of
Learning and Motivation.
Barsalou, L.W. 1992. Frames,
concepts, and conceptual fields. In A. Lehrer, E. Feder Kittay. Frames,
Fields, and Contrasts: New essays in Semantica and Lexical Organization.
21-74.
Barsalou, L.W. 1993. Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in
concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols.
In A. Collins, S.E. Gathercole, and M.A. Conway (eds.) Theories of Memory.
29-101.
Barsalou,
L.W. 1999. Perceptual
symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 577-660.
Barsalou,
L.W. and Bower, G. 1980. A priori determinants of a concept’s highly accessible
information. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association
Convention.
Barsalou, L.W. and Hale, C. 1993. Components
of conceptual representation: from feature lists to recursive frames. In I.
Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. Michalski, & P. Theuns (eds.) Categories
and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis. 97-144.
Academic Press,
Barsalou,
L.W. Salomon, K. and Wu, L. 1999. Perceptual
simulation in conceptual tasks. In M. Hiraga, C. Sinha and
Barsalou,
L.W., and Sewell, D.R. 1985. Contrasting
the representation of scripts and categories. Journal of Memory and
Language, 24, 646-665.1984.
Barsalou, L.W., Medin, D. 1986. Concepts: fixed
definitions or context-dependent representations? Cashier de Psychologie
Cognitive 6: 187-202.
Barsalou, L.W., Sewel, D.R.. and Spindler, J.L. (ms) Flexibility and
stability in concepts.
Barsalou, L.W., Yeh,
W., Luka, B., Olseth, K., Mix, K. and Wu, L. 1993. Concepts and Meaning. In K. Beals, G.
Cooke, D. Kathman, K.E. McCullough, S. Kita, and D. Testen (eds.) Chicago
Linguistics Society 29: Papers from the Parasession on Conceptual
Representations.
Becker, A. 1997.
Emergent and common features influence metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and
Symbol, 12 (4): 243-259.
Benari, M. 2004. If it is different then how come it is similar? The
impressions of sameness and difference experienced by readers of metaphoric
language. Pragmatics and
Cognition 12 (2): 351-373.
Bertuccelli
Papi, M. 2000. Is a diachronic speech-act theory possible? Journal of
Historical Pragmatics 1:57-66.
Bertuccelli
Papi, M.1997. Implicitness. In J. Verschueren, J-O. Östman, J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds.). Handbook of Pragmatics.
Bezuidenhout, A. and
Cutting, J.C. 2002. Literal meaning, minimal propositions and pragmatic
processing. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 433-456.
Bierwisch,
M. 1989. The semantics of gradation. In M. Bierwisch and E. Lang (eds.) Dimensional
Adjectives. 71-261. Springer-Verlag (?),
Black, M.
1962 Models and Metaphors. Cornell UP,
Black, M. 1962. Metaphor. In M. Black. Models and Metaphors. 25-47.
Black, M. 1979. How
metaphors work: a reply to Donald Davidson. On sacks, S (ed) 1979. On
Metaphor.
Black, M. 1979. More about metaphor. In A. Ortony
(ed.) Metaphor and Thought. 19-43.
Blakemore,
D. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Blackwell,
Blakemore,
D. 1992. Understanding Utterances. Blackwell,
Blakemore, D. 2002. Linguistic Meaning and
Relevance: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers.
Blasko, D.
1999. On the tip of the iceberg: who understands what
about metaphor? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1675-1683
Blasko, D. and Connine, C.M. 1993. Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Metaphor and Cognition
19(2): 295-308.
Bloom, P.
2000. How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. MIT Press,
Blutner,
R. 1998. Lexical pragmatics. Journal
of Semantics 15: 115-162.
Blutner,
R. 2000. Some aspects of optimality
in natural language interpretation. Journal of Semantics 17:
189-216.
Blutner,
R. 2002. Lexical semantics and
pragmatics. Linguistische Berichte 10: 27-58.
Bock, J.
and
Bock, K. and Brewer,
W. 1980. Comprehension and memory of the literal and figurative
meaning of proverbs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 9
(1): 59-72.
Bortfeld, H. McGlone, M. 2001. The continuum of metaphor processing. Metaphor
and Symbol 16 (1&2) 75-86)
Bowdle, B. and Gentner, D. 1999. Metaphor
comprehension: from comparison to categorisation. Proceedings of the
Twenty-Fist Conference of The Cognitive Science Society, 90-95.
Braisby, N. Franks, B. and Hampton, J. 1996.
Essentialism, word use, and concepts. Cognition 59: 247-274.
Brewer, W.
1977. Memory for the pragmatic implication of sentences. Memory and
Cognition 5(6): 673-678.
Brown, S.
and Craik, F. 2000. Encoding and Retrieval of Information. In E. Tulving and F.
Craik (eds.) The
Brugman, C. 1997.
Polysemy. In J. Verschueren and J-O. Ostman, J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds.)
Handbook
of Pragmatics. John Benjamins, Ámsterdam.
Buitrago, 2002. Diccionario de Dichos y Frases
Hechas. Espasa, Madrid.
Cacciari, C.
1998. Why do we speak Metaphorically? Reflections in thought and
language. In. A. N. Katz, C. Cacciari, R.W. Gibbs Jr. and M. Turner. 1998. Figurative
Language and Thought. 119-157.
Cacciari, C. and Glucksberg, S. 1991. Understanding idiomatic
expressions: the contribution of word meanings. In G.B. Simpson (ed.) Understanding
Word and Sentence. 217-240. Elsevier,
Cacciari, C. and Glucksberg, S. 1994.
Understanding figurative language. In Gernsbacher (ed.) Handbook of
Psycholinguistics. 447-477.
Academic Press.
Cacciari, C. and Glucksberg, S. 1995a. Imaging
idiomatic expressions: literal or figurative meanings? In M. Everaert et al.
(eds.) Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives. 43-56.
Cacciari, C. and
Glucksberg, S. 1995b. Understanding idioms: do visual images reflect figurative
meanings. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 7 (3): 283-305.
Cacciari, C. and Levorato, M.C. 1989. How children understand idioms in
discourse. Journal of Child Language 16: 387-405.
Cacciari, C. and
Levorato, M.C. 1998. The effect of semantic analysability of idioms in
metalinguistic tasks. Metaphor and Symbol. 13(3): 159-177.
Cacciari, C., Levorato M.C. and Cicogna, P. 1997.
Imagination at work: conceptual and linguistic creativity in children. In M.
Ward. et al. (eds.) Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual
Structures and Processes. 179-208. American Psychological Association,
Camac, M.K. and Glucksberg, S. 1984. Metaphors do not
use associations between concepts, they are used to create them. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research 13: 443-455.
Camarazza, A. and Grober, E. 1976. Polysemy and the structure of the
subjective lexicon. In: C. Rameh (ed.)
Cameron, L. and Deignan, A. 2003. Combining large
and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken
discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18/3, 149-160.
Carruthers,
P. and Boucher, J. eds. 1998. Language and Thought.
Carston, R. 1997. Enrichment and
loosening: complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed. Linguistische Berichte 8, Special Issue
on Pragmatics, 103-127. Also in 1996 UCL
Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 61-88
Carston, R. 1998a. Pragmatics and the Explicit/Implicit
Distinction. PhD Dissertation.
Carston, R. 1999. The
semantics/pragmatics distinction: a view from relevance theory. In K.
turner (ed.) The Sematics/Pragmatics
Interface from Different Points of View (CRiSPI 1). Elsevier Science. Also
in UCL
Working Papers in Linguistics
Carston, R. 2002a. Thoughts and Utterances.
Carston, R. 2002b. Linguistic
meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics. Mind and Language 17: 127-148.
Carston, R. 2002c. Metaphor, ad
hoc concepts and word meaning – more questions than answers. UCL
Working Papers in Lingusitics 14: 83-105.
Carston, R. 2004a. Explicature
and semantics. In
Carston, R. 2004b. Relevance
theory and the saying/implicating distinction. In L. Horn and G. Ward
(eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics.
Carston, R. 2004c. Truthconditional
content and conversational implicature. In C. Bianchi (ed.) The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.
CSLI Publications.
Carston, R. and Uchida,
S. (eds.) 1998. Relevance Theory:
Applications and Implications. John Benjamins:
Carston, R. and
Wilson, D. 2005. The Pragmatics of metaphor: the ‘emergent property’ issue.
Paper presented at Metaphor: an Interdisciplinary Conference.
Chiappe, D. & Kennedy, J. 1999.
Aptness predicts preference for metaphors or similes, as well as recall bias. Psychonomic
Bulletin and Review 6(4):668-676
Chiappe, D. 2000. Metaphor, modularity, and the evolution of conceptual
integration. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(3): 137-158
Clark, E. and Clark, H. 1979. When Nouns
Surface as Verbs. Language 55, 767-811.
Clark, H. 1983. Making sense of nonce sense. In G. Flores d’Arcais
& R. Jarvella (Eds.). The Process of Understanding Language.
297-332.
Clark, H. 1991. Words, the world and their possibilities. In G.
Lockhead & J, Pomerantz (eds.). The Perception of Structure: Essays in
honor of Wendell Garner. 263-277.
Clark, H. and Gerrig, R. 1983. Understanding old words with new
meanings. Journal of verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 22, 591-608.
Cohen, J. Dunbar, K. and MacClelland, J. 1990. On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing
account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review 97:
332-361.
Cohen, L.J. 1979/93. The semantics of metaphor. In Ortony, A.
(ed.) Metaphor and Thought, 64-77.
Collins, A.M. and Loftus, E.F. 1975. A spreading activation theory of
semantic processing. Psychological Review 82: 407-428.
Colston, H. and Gibbs, R.W. 2002. Are irony and metaphor understood differently?
Metaphor and Symbol 17 (1): 57-80.
Cooper, R. & Franks,
B. 1996 The interation of concept combination in sense
generation. In Cottrell, G. W. (eds.), Proceedings of the
18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Copestake, A. and Briscoe, T. 1995. Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. Journal of Semantics 12: 15-67.
Coulmas,
F. (ed.) 1981a. Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standarized
Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech. Mouton Publishers,
Coulmas, F. 1981b.
Idiomaticity as a problem of pragmatics. In H. Parret (ed.) Possibilities
and Limitations of Pragmatics. 139-151. John Benhamins,
Coulson, S. and Van Petten, C. 2002. Conceptual integration and metaphor: an event-related
potential study. Memory and Cognition 30 (6): 958-968
Craik, F. 2002. Levels of processing: past, present … and future? Memory
10(5/6): 305-318
Craik, F.
and Lockhart, R. 1972. Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal
of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11: 671-684.
Craik, F. and Tulving, E. 1975.
Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General, 104: 208-294
Cremark, L. and Craik, F. (eds.) 1979. Levels of Processing in
Human Memory.
Cruse, A. 1986. Lexical Semantics.
Dascal, M. 1987. Defending literal meaning. Cognitive Science
11: 259-281
Dascal, M. 1989. On the roles of context
and literal meaning in understanding. Cognitive Science 13: 253-257.
Davidson, D. 1967. Truth and meaning. Synthese 17,
304-323. Reprinted in Davidson, D. 1984. Inquiries into
Truth and Interpretation, 17-36.
Davidson, D. 1977. What metaphors mean. In
S. Sacks (ed.). On Metaphor.
Davies, M. 1982. Idiom and metaphor. In Proceedings
of the Aristotelian Society 83, 67–85
Davis, S. and Brendan, G. 2004, Semantics: a Reader.
Deane, P. 1988. Polysemy and cognition. Lingua
75, 325-361.
Deignan, A. 1999. Corpus-based research into
metaphor. in: L. Cameron and G. D. Low (Ed.) Researching and Applying
Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. NOTES
Deignan, A. 1999. Linguistic Metaphors and
Collocation in Non-literary Corpus Data. Metaphor
and Symbol, 14/1, 19-36. NOTES
Deignan, A. 1999. Metaphorical
polysemy and paradigmatic relations: A corpus study. Word, 50/3, 319-338.
Deignan, A. 2003. Metaphorical expressions and
culture: an indirect link. Metaphor and Symbol,
18/4, 255-272.
Deignan, A. 2005. Metaphor
and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Deignan, A. and Potter, L. 2004. A corpus study of metaphors and metonyms in English
and Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 36/7, 1231-1252. NOTES
Deignan, A. Forthcoming. The
grammar of linguistic metaphors. in: A. Stefanowitsch and S. Gries (Ed.) Corpus-Based
Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and
Monographs 171). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ducrot, O, 1973, Le
preuve et le dire, Paris, Mame
Ducrot, O. 1972, Dire et
ne pas dire, Paris, Hermann.
Ducrot, O. 1980. Analyses
pragmatiques. Communications 32:11-60.
Ducrot, O. 1984. Le dire
et le dit. Paris,
Minuit.
Dunkling, L. 1998. Dictionary of Curious Phrases. Harper
Collins, Glasgow.
Erickson, T. and Mattson, M. 1981. From words to
meaning: a semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behaviour Nº 20: 540-552.
Estes, Z. and Glucksberg, S. 1999. Relevance and Feature Accessibility
in Combined Concepts. In M. Hahn & S.C. Stones. (Eds.) Proceedings of
the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
149-154. Erlbaum:
Estes, Z. and Glucksberg, S. 2000a. Interactive property attribution in
concept combination. Memory and Cognition 28: 28-34.
Estes, Z.
and Glucksberg, S. 2000b. Similarity and attribution in concept combination:
reply to Wisniewski. Memory and Cognition 28: 39-40.
Fauconnier,
G. and Turner, M. 1998. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive
Science 22(2): 133-187.
Fauconnier,
G. and Turner, M. 2002. The Way We Think. Basic Books.
Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B.
and Smith, S.M. 1992. Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Application.
MIT Press,
Fitts, P. and Posner, M. 1967. Human Performance. Brooks Cole, Belmont, CA.
Flores
d’Arcais, G. 1993. The comprehension and semantic interpretation of idioms. In C. Cacciari
and P. Tabossi (eds.). Idioms: Processing, Structure, and Interpretation.
79-98.
Fodor, J. 1975. The Language of Thought.
Fodor, J. 1983. The Modularity of Mind.
Fodor, J. 1998. Concepts: where Cognitive Science Went Wrong.
Clarendon Press,
Fodor, J. 2001.
Language, thought and compositionality. Mind and Language 16,
1-15.
Franks, B. 1995. Sense generation: a ‘quasi-classical’ approach to concepts
and concept combination. Cognitive Science 19: 441-505.
Franks, B. and Braisby, N. 1990. Sense generation or how to make a
mental lexicon flexible. In Proceedings of the 12th annual conference of the
cognitive science society.
Galinsky,
A. and Glucksberg, S. 2000. Inhibition of the literal: metaphors and idioms as
judgmental primes. Social Cognition 18: 1 35-54.
Garrod, S. and
Sandford, T. 1988. Thematic subjecthood and cognitive constrains on discourse
structure. Journal of Pragmatics 12, 519-534 (??)
Gentner, D. 1983. Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy.
Cognitive Science 7: 155-170.
Gentner, D. 1989. The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S.
Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.) Similarity and Analogical reasoning.
199-241.
Gentner,
D. and Bowdle, B. 2001. Convention, form and figurative processing.
Metaphor and Symbol 16(3): 223-247.
Gentner, D. and Wolff, P. 1997. Alignment in the processing of metaphor. Journal
of Memory and Language 37: 331-355.
Gentner, D., Bowdle, B., Wolff, P. and
Boronat, C. 2001. Metaphor is like analogy. In
Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. and Kokinov, B. (eds.) 2001. The Analogical Mind:
Perspectives from Cognitive Science. 199-253.
Gernsbacher, M.A., Keysar, B., Robertson,
R. and Werner, N. 2001. The role of suppression and enhancement in
understanding metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language 45:
433-450.
Gibbs,
R. 1991. Semantic analyzability in children’s understanding of idioms. Journal
of Speech and Hearing Research 34: 613-620.
Gibbs, R. 1992 Categorization and metaphor understanding. Psychological
Review 99: 572-577
Gibbs, R. 1993. Process and Products in Making Sense of Tropes. In A.
Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought.252-276.
Gibbs, R. 1994a. The
Poetics of Mind.
Gibbs, R. 1994b. Figurative Thought and Figurative Language. M. A.
Gernsbacher (ed.) Handbook of Psycholinguistics. 411- 446. Academic
Press,
Gibbs, R. 1995. What’s Cognitive about Cognitive Linguistics? In E. H. Casad (ed.). Cognitive
Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics.
27-53.
Gibbs, R. 1996. Why many concepts are metaphorical. Cognition
61: 309-319.
Gibbs,
R. 1998. The fight over metaphor in thought and language. In N. Katz,C.
Cacciari, R. Gibbs, M. Turner. 1998. Figurative Language and Thought.
88-118.
Gibbs, R. 1999a.
Interpreting what the speaker say and implicate. Brain and Language 68:
466-485.
Gibbs, R. 1999b. Speaker's intuitions and pragmatic theory. Cognition
69: 355-359.
Gibbs, R. 1999c. Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into
the cultural world. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.). 1999. Metaphor in
Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive
Linguistics Conference. 145-166. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Publishing Company.
Gibbs, R. 2001a. Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language
understanding. Metaphor and Symbol. 16 (3 & 4):
317-333.
Gibbs, R. 2001b. Proverbial themes we live by. Poetics
29: 167-188.
Gibbs, R. 2002a. A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said
and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics 34(4): 457-486.
Gibbs, R. 2002b.
Experimental psychology and pragmatics. ICU Open Lectures on Cognitive
Pragmatics. ICU,
Gibbs,
R. and Bogdonovich, J. 1999. Mental imagery in interpreting poetic metaphor. Metaphor
and Symbol
Gibbs, R. and Moise, J. F. 1997. Pragmatics in understanding what is said. Cognition
62: 51-74.
Gibbs,
R. and Tendahl, M. Forthcoming. Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor
comprehension: relevance theory and psycholinguistics. To appear in Mind and
Language.
Gibbs, R., Bogdonovich, J., Sykes, J. and Barr, D. 1997 Metaphor in idiom
comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 37:
141-154.
Gibbs, R., Buchalter,
D, Moise, J. and Farrar, W. 1993. Literal meaning and figurative meaning. Discourse
Processes 16: 387-404.
Gibbs,
R., Nayak, N.,
Gieger, O. and Ward, L. 1999. Metaphors and the mental Lexicon. Brain
and Language 68: 192-198.
Gildea,
P. and Glucksberg, S. 1983. On understanding metaphor: the role of context. Journal
of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 22: 577-590.
Gineste, M.D., Indurkhya, B. and Scart, V.
2000. Emergence of features in metaphor comprehension.
Metaphor and Symbol 15 (3): 117-135.
Giora, R. 1999. On the priority of salient meanings: Studies in literal and
figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 919-929.
Giora, R. and Fein, O. 1999 On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative
language. Journal of
Pragmatics 31: 1601-1618.
Glass, A., Holyoak, K. and Santa, J. 1979. Cognition.
Glucksberg, S. 1991. Beyond literal
meanings: the psychology of allusion. Psychological science 2: 146-52.
Glucksberg, S. 2001. Beyond the literal. In
Glucksberg, S. 2001. On the fate(s) of literal meanings. Paper presented
at Workshop Towards an Experimental Pragmatics,
Glucksberg, S. 2001.
Understanding Figurative Language: from Metaphors to Idioms.
Glucksberg, S. and Cacciari, C. 1989. Contributions of word meanings to idiomatic meanings. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27(6): 531-531.
Glucksberg,
S. and Estes, Z. 2000. Feature
accessibility in conceptual combination: effects of context-induced relevance.
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7(3): 510-515.
Glucksberg,
S. and Keysar, B. 1990. Understanding metaphorical comparisons: beyond
similarity. Psychological Review 1: 3-18.
Glucksberg, S. and Keysar, B. 1993. How metaphors work. In A. Ortony. Metaphor
and Thought. 401-424. Second
Edition.
Glucksberg,
S. and McGlone, M. 1999. When Love is not a journey: what metaphors mean.
Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1541-1558.
Glucksberg,
S. Brown, M.E and McGlone, M.S. 1993. Conceptual metaphors are not
automatically accessed during idioms comprehension. Memory and Cognition
21(5): 711-719.
Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P and Bookin, H.A.
1982. On understanding nonliteral speech: can people ignore metaphors? Journal
of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 21: 85-98.
Glucksberg,
S., Keysar, B. and McGlone, M. 1992. Metaphor understanding and accessing conceptual schema: reply to Gibbs.
Psychological Review 99: 578-581.
Glucksberg,
S., Kreuz, R. and
Glucksberg,
S., Manfredi, D. and McGlone, M. 1997. Metaphor comprehension: how metaphors
create new categories. In T. Ward, S. Smith and J. Vaid (eds.) Creative
Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. 327-350.
American Psychological Association,
Glucksberg,
S., McGlone, M. and Manfredy, D. 1997. Property Attribution in Metaphor
comprehension. Memory and Language 36: 50-67.
Glucksberg,
S., Newsome, MR. and Goldvarg, Y. 2001 Inhibition of the literal: filtering metaphor–irrelevant
information during metaphor comprehension. Metaphor
and Symbol 16(3/4): 277-293.
Goatly, A. 1994. Register and the redemption of relevance theory. The
case of metaphor. Pragmatics 4: 139-181.
Goldvarg, Y. and
Glucksberg, S. 1998. Conceptual combinations: the role of similarity. Metaphor
and symbol 13, 243-255
Goodman, N. 1972.
Seven strictures on similarity. In N. Goodman. Problems and Projects.
22-32. Bobs-Merrill,
Goosens, L., Pawels, P., Rudka-Ostyn, B., Simon-Vanderbergen, A:M. and
Anparys, J.M. 1995. By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic
Action in a Cognitive Perspective.
Goswami, U. 2001. Analogical reasoning in
children. In Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., and Kokinov, B. N. (Eds.) The
Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, pp. 437-470.
Grady, J., Oakley, T. and Coulson, S.
2000. Blending and Metaphor. In G. Steen and R. Gibbs (eds) Metaphor in
Cognitive Linguistics. 101-124. John Benjamins,
Grice, H. P. 1967. Logic and conversation. William James
Lectures, reprinted in Grice 1989.
Grice, H.P.
1975/1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard UP,
Gross, S. 2001. Essays on Linguistic Context-Sensitivity and its
Philosophical Significance. Routledge,
Gutt, E.A. 1991. Translation and Relevance. Blackwell,
Hahn,
U. and Chater, N. 1997. Concepts and similarity. In K. Lamberts and D. Shanks. Knowledge,
Concepts and Categories. 43-93. Psychology Press.
Hampton,
J. 1997. Emergent attributes in combined concepts. In T. Ward, S. Smith and J.
Vaid (eds.) Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structures and
Processes. 83-110. American Psychological Association,
Hannon, B. and Craik, F. 2001. Encoding
specificity revisited: the role of semantics. Canadian Journal of
Experimental Psychology 55(3): 231-243.
Happé, F. 1993. Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism:
a test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48: 101-119.
Happé, F. 1994. Understanding minds and metaphors: insights from the
study of figurative language in autism. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10:
275-295.
Honeck, R. and Kibler, C. 1985.
Representation in cognitive psychological theories of figurative language. In
W. Paprotte and R. Dirven (eds.) The Ubiquity of Metaphor. Current
Issues in Lingusitic Theory. 381-423. John Benjamins,
Hopper, P. and Traugott, E. 1993. Grammaticalization,
Horn, L. 1984. Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based
and R-based implicature,” in Schiffrin (1987:11-42).
Horn, L. 1992. The said and the unsaid.
Horn, L. 2000. From if to iff: conditional perfection as
pragmatic strengthening,” Journal of Pragmatics 32:289-326.
Horn, L. and Ward, G. (eds.). 2004. Handbook of Pragmatics,
Horsey, R. 2002. The art of chicken sexing. UCL Working
Papers in Linguistics 14: 107-117.
Johnson,
M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Reason and Imagination.
Journal of
experimental psychology: learning, memory and cognition, 15, 779-790
Journal
of Pragmatics
31. 1999
Journal
of Pragmatics 36.
2004.
Journal
of Pragmatics 37.
2005.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1996. Beyond Modularity: a Developmental
Perspective on Cognitive Science. MIT Press,
Katz,
A. 1998a. Figure. In A. Katz, C. Cacciari, R. Gibbs, M. Turner. 1998. Figurative
Language and Thought.
Katz,
A. 1998b. Figurative language and figurative thought: a review. In A. Katz, C.
Cacciari, R. Gibbs, M. Turner. 1998. Figurative Language and Thought.
3-87.
Katz,
A., Turner, M., Gibbs, R., and Cacciari, C. 1998. Counterpoint commentary. In .
Katz, C. Cacciari, R. Gibbs, M. Turner. 1998. Figurative Language and
Thought. 158-191.
Keane, M. and Costello, F. 2001. Setting limits on
analogy: why conceptual combination is not structural alignment. . In Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., and Kokinov, B. N.
(Eds.) The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, pp.
287-312.
Keysar,
B. 1989. On the functional equivalence of literal and metaphorical
interpretations in discourse. Journal of Memory and Language 28:
375-385.
Keysar, B. 1994. Discourse Context Effects: Metaphorical and Literal
Interpretations. Discourse Processes 18, pp. 247-269.
Keysar,
B. and Bly, B. 1995. Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: can one keep a
secret by spilling the beans? Journal of Memory and Language
34: 89-109.
Keysar,
B. and Bly, B. 1999. Swimming against the current: do idioms reflect conceptual
structure? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1559-1578.
Keysar, B. and Glucksberg, S. 1993 Metaphor and communication. Poetics
today 13: 633-658.
Keysar,
B., Shen, Y., Glucksberg, S. and Horton, W. 2000. Conventional language: how metaphorical is it?
Journal of Memory and Language 43: 576-593.
Kintsh, W. 2000. Metaphor comprehension: a computational theory.
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7(2): 257-266.
Kittay, E. 1987. Metaphor: its Cognitive Force and Linguistic
Structure.
Kittay, E. 1997. Of “men” and
metaphors: Shakespeare, embodiment, and filing cabinets. In Ward, T. B. Et al.
(eds.). 1997. Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structures
and Processes. 375-402.Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Kittay, E. and Adrienne Lehrer (eds.) (1992), Frames, Fields, and
Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization,
Klein, D. and Murphy, G. 2001. The representation of polysemous words. Journal
of Memory and Language 45: 259-282.
Lahav, R. 1989. Against compositionality: the case of adjectives, Philosophical
Studies 55:111-129.
Lakoff, G. 1986. The meanings of literal. Metaphor and Symbolic
Activity 1: 291-296.
Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony,
A. (ed.), 202-251.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980 The metaphorical structure of the
human conceptual system Cognitive science 4, 195-208
Lakoff, G. and
Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live by.
Lakoff, G. and
Turner, M. 1989. More than Cool Reason: a Field Guide for Poetic Metaphor.
Lakoff, G., 1987. Women,
Fire and Dangerous Things: what Categories Reveal about the Mind.
Lamberts, K. and Shanks, D. (eds.) 1997. Knowledge, Concepts and
Categories. Psychology Press, Hove.
Lascarides, A. and Copestake, A.1998. Pragmatics and
Word Meaning, Journal of Linguistics 34.2, pp387-414,
Lascarides, A., Copestake, A. & Briscoe, T. 1996. Ambiguity and Coherence. Journal of
Semantics, nº 13, pp. 41-65.
Lasersohn, P. 1999. Pragmatic halos. Language 75:
522-551.
Laurence, S. & Margolis, E. 1999. Concepts and cognitive science.
In Margolis, E. & Laurence, S. (eds.) Concepts: Core
Leslie, A. 1987. Children’s understanding of the mental world. In
Gregory, R. (ed.) The
Levelt, W. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation, MIT
Press,
Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics.
Levinson, S. 2000. Presumptive Meanings. MIT Press,
Levorato, M.C. 1993. The acquisition of idioms and the development of
figurative competence. In C. Cacciari and P. Tabossi (eds.) Idioms:
Processing, Structure, and Interpretation. 101-123.
Levorato, M.C. and Cacciari, C. 1992. Children’s comprehension and
production of idioms: the role of context and familiarity. Journal of Child
Language 19: 415-433.
Levorato,
M.C. and Cacciari, C. 1995. The effects of Different tasks on the comprehension and
production of idioms in children. Journal of Experimental
Child Psychology 60: 261-283.
Levorato, M.C. and Cacciari, C. 1999.
Idiom comprehension in children: are the effects of semantic analysability and
context separable? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 11 (1):
51-66.
Lewis, D. 1975. Languages and language. In K. Gunderson (ed.)
Lewis, D. 1979/83 Scorekeeping
in a language game. In D. Lewis 1983 Philosophical Papers.
Lewis, D. 1983. Philosophical papers, volume I. Oxford
University Press,
Locke, J. 1690. An essay concerning human understanding.
Original manuscript
Lockhart, R. 2002. Levels of processing, transfer appropriate processing,
and the concept of robust encoding. Memory 10 (5/6): 397-403.
Lockhart, R., Craik, F. & Jacoby, L.
1976. Depth of processing, recognition and recall. In Brown, J. (ed.) (1976)
Recall and Recognition. 75-102. Wiley & Sons,
Lutz, John. 1994. An Introduction to Learning and Memory.
Brooks/Cole Publishing Company,
Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics, volume 2.
MacLeod, C. and
Dunbar, K. 1988. Training and Stoop-like interference: evidence for a
continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 14: 126-135.
Malgadi, R.G. and
Johnson, M. 1976. Modifiers in metaphors: effects of constituent phrase
similarity on the interpretation of figurative sentences. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 55: 95-107.
Margolis, E. and S.
Laurence. 1998. Concepts: Core readings.
Markman,
A. B., Yamauchi, T and Makin, V. S. 1997. The creation of new concepts: a
multifaceted approach to category learning. In Ward et al. Creative Thought.
Pp170-208.
Marslen-Wilson, W. and
Marslen-Wilson, W.D., 1987. Functional parallelism in spoken word
recognition. Cognitive
Psychology 25:
71-102.
Maruenda
Bataller, Sergio. 2005. La pragmatica lexica y la negociacion del significado. Interlinguistica
15.
Maruenda Bataller, Sergio. 2005. Lexical pragmatics and negotiation of
meaning. PhD thesis.
Matos Amaral, P. 2000. Metaphor and Relevance.
Philologie im Netz
McElree,
B & Nordie, J. 1999. Literal and figurative interpretations are computed in
equal time. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6 (3):
486-494
McGlone, M.S. 1996.
Conceptual metaphors and figurative language understanding: food for thought. Journal
of Memory and Language 35: 544-465.
McGlone, M.S. 2001.
Concepts as metaphors. In
McGlone,
M.S. and Manfredi, D. 2001. Topic-vehicle interaction in metaphor comprehension.
Memory and Cognition 29(8): 1209-1219.
McGlone, M.S., Glucksberg, S. and
Cacciari, C. 1994. Semantic productivity in idiom comprehension. Discourse Processes
17: 167-190.
Medin, Douglas. L., Ortony, Andrew, 1989. Psychological essentialism.
In: Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A. (Eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning.
Memory
2002. Vol 10 (5/6). Special issue on Levels of Processing.
Merlini Barbaresi, L. 2003. Complexity in Language and
Meyer, D.E. and Schvaneveldt, R.W. 1971. Facilitation in recognising
pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal
of Experimental Psychology 90: 227-234.
Miller, G.. 1993. Images and Models, Similes and Metaphors. In A.
Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. 357–400.
Mitake, A., M. A. Just, and P. Carpenter (1994). Working Memory
Constraints on the Resolution of Lexical Ambiguity: Maintaining Multiple
Interpretations in Neutral Contexts”. Journal of Memory and Language,
33, pp. 175-202. (?)
Moon R. 1998a. Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: a
Corpus-based Approach. Clarendon Press,
Moon, R. 1998b. Ambiguity, polysemy, and metaphor. In R. Moon. 1998.
Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach. ??.
Moon, R. 1998c. Frequencies and forms of phrasal lexemes in
English in A. Cowie (ed.) Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and
Applications. 79-100.
Morgan, J. L.: 1978, ‘Two
Types of Convention
in Indirect Speech Acts’, in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 9:
Pragmatics, Academic Press, pp. 261–280.
Murphy,
G. 1996. On metaphorical representation. Cognition
60: 173-204.
Murphy, G. 1997.
Polysemy and the creation of novel word meanings. In T. Ward, S. Smith and J.
Vaid. Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structures and
Processes. 235-265.
Murphy, G. 1997. Reasons to doubt the present evidence for metaphoric
representation. Cognition
62: 99-108.
Murphy, G. 2002. The Big Book on Concepts. MIT Press
Murphy, G. and J. Andrew. 1993. The conceptual basis of antonymy and synonymy in
adjectives. Journal of Memory and Language 32, 301-319.
Neisser, U. (ed). 1987. Concepts and Conceptual Development,
Nicolle, S. & Clark, B. 1999. Experimental
pragmatics and what is said: A response to Gibbs and Moise. Cognition 69,
337-354.
Noh, E-J. 2000. Metarepresentation: A Relevance Theory
Approach. Revised version of Noh (1998).
Noveck,
Nunberg, G. 1978. The
Pragmatics of Reference.
Nunberg, G. 1995. Transfers of Meaning. Journal of Semantics 12,
109-132.
Nunberg, G., Sag,
Onifer, W. and Swinney, DA. 1981 Accessing lexical ambiguities ...
sentence comprehension: effects of frequency of meaning and context bias. Memory
and Cognition 9, 225-236
Onishi, K. and Gregory, M. 1993.
Metaphoric reference: when metaphors are understood as easily as literal
expressions. Memory and Cognition 21:6 763-772
Origgi G. & Sperber, D. 2000. Evolution,
communication and the proper function of language. To appear in
P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (eds) Evolution and the human mind:
Language, modularity and social cognition.
Ortony, A. (ed.) 1993. Metaphor and Thought. Second Edition.
Ortony, A. 1979. Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review, 86:
1671-180.
Ortony, A. 1980. Some
psycholinguistic aspects of metaphor. In Honeck, R.& Hoffman, R. (eds.) Cognition
and Figurative Language. 69-86.
Ortony, A. 1984 Understanding figurative language In D Pearson (ed) Handbook of reading research 16,
417-441
Ortony, A. 1993.
Metaphor, language and thought. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. Second
edition.
Ortony, A.,
Schallert, D., Reynolds, R. and Antos, S. 1978. Interpreting metaphors and
idioms: some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning
and Verbal Behaviour 17: 465-477.
Paivio,
A. (1990) Dual coding theory. In Paivio, A. Mental Representations: a Dual
Coding Approach.
Papafragou, A. 1995. Metonymy and relevance. UCL Working
Papers in Linguistics 7: 141-175.
Papafragou, A. 1996a. Figurative language and the semantics/pragmatics
distinction. Language and Literature 5, 179-93.
Papafragou, A. 1996b. On metonymy. Lingua 99: 169-195.
Papafragou, A. 1998a.
Experience and concept attainment: Some critical remarks.
UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 109-141.
Papafragou, A. 1998b. Inference and word meaning: The case of modal auxiliaries.
Lingua 105, 1-47.
Papagrafou, A. 2000. Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics
Interface.Amsterdam/
Partee, B. 1995. Lexical semantics and
compositionality. In L. Gleitman and M. Liberman (eds.) An
Introduction to Cognitive Science, vol.1: LangaugeI, 311-360.
Peterson,
P. and Burgess, C. 1993. Syntactic and semantic processing during idiom
comprehension: neurolinguistic and psycholinguistic dissociations. In C.
Cacciari and P. Tabossi. (eds.) Idioms: Processing, Structure, and
Interpretation. 201-225.
Piaget, J
1926. The language and thought of a child (M Warcen Trans)New York
Harcourt Brace
Pilkington, A. 2000. Metaphor. Chapter 4
of. Pilkington, A. Poetic Effects: a Relevance Theory Perspective. 85-121.
John Benjamins,
Pilkington, A. 2000. Poetic Effects: a Relevance Theory
Perspective. John Benjamins,
Pilkington, A. 1992. Poetic
effects. Lingua 87, 29-51.
Pilkington, A. 1994. Poetic Thoughts and Poetic
Effects: A Relevance Theory Account of the Literary Use of Rhetorical Tropes
and Schemes. PhD thesis,
Pilkington, Adrian. 1990 A relevance theoretic view of metaphor. Parlance
2: 102-117.
Posner, M.I., and Snyder, C.R. 1975. Attention and cognitive control.
In R.L. Solso (ed.) Information Processing and Cognition: the Loyola
Symposium. 55-85. Lawerence Erlbaum,
Praprotte, Dirven. 1985. representation in cognitive psychological
theories of figurative language. In the Ubiquity of Metaphor
Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The Generative Lexicon.
Pustejovsky, J. 1998. Generativity and explanation in semantics: a
reply to Fodor and Lepore. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 289-311.
Pustejovsky, J. and Boguraev, B. 1995. Introduction: Lexical semantics in context. Journal of Semantics 12: 1-14.
Putnam, H. 1975. the
meaning of “meaning”. In Mind, Language and Reality. Vol2. Philosophical
Papers.
Ratcliff,
R & McKoon, G 1986 Automatic activation of episodic information in a semantic
memory task. Journal of experimental Psychology: learning,
memory and Cognition 12, 108-115
Ratcliff, R. and McKnoon, G. 1981. Does activation really spread? Psychological
Review 88: 454-462.
Ratneschwar, S., Barsalou, L.W., Pechmann, C. & Moore, M. 2001. Goal derived categories: The role of personal and
situational goals in category representation. Journal of
Consumer Research, 10, 147-157.
Ravin, Y. and C. Leacock. 2000. Polysemy: Theoretical and
Computational Approaches.
Recanati, F. 1989. The pragmatics of what
is said. Mind and Language 4, 295‑329.
Recanati, F. 1995. The alleged priority of literal interpretation.
Cognitive Science 19: 207-232.
Recanati, F. 2002. The limits of expressibility. In B. Smith
(ed.) John Searle.
Recanati, F. 2003. Contextualism: how far
can we go? Chapter 9 of Recanati, F. Literal Meaning.
Recanati, F. 2003. Literal
Meaning.
Recanati, F. 2001. What is said. Synthese 128: 75-91.
Recanati, F. 2002. Does
linguistic communication rest on inference? Mind and Language
17 (1&2) 105-126
Reddy, M. 1979. The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.). Metaphor
and Thought. 224-324.
Reimer, M. 1998. What is meant by “what is said”?: A reply to
Cappelen and Lepore. Mind and Language 13, 598-604.
Richards, I.A. 1936. The
Philosophy of Rhetoric.
Riechmann,
P. & Coste, E. 1980. Mental imagery and the comprehension of figurative
language: is there a relationship? In R. Honeck & R. Hoffman. Cognition
and Figurative Language. 183-200.
Rips, Lance J., 1995. The current
status of research on concept combination. Mind
and Language 10: 72-104.
Rips, nce J. 1989. Similarity,
typicality, and categorization. In S. Voniadou & A. Ortony (eds.). Similarity
and Analogical Reasoning. 21-59.
Ritchie, D. 2003. Categories and similarities: a note on circularity. Metaphor
and Symbol 18(1): 49-53.
Ritchie,
D. 2004. Metaphors
in Conversational Context: Toward a Connectivity Theory of Metaphor
Interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 19: 265-287.
Rosch, E. 1978. Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. Lloyd
(eds.) Cognition and Categorization. 28-46.
Rosch. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories
Roth, E.M. &
Shoben, E.J. 1983. The effect of context on the structure of categories. Cognitive
Psychology, 15 346-378.
Rubio Fernández, P. ¿? Understanding
nominal metaphors: beyond class inclusion
Rubio Fernandez, P. 2001. Inhibition of
core features in metaphor interpretation. RCEAL Working Papers,
Rubio Fernández, P. 2005. Cognitive Mechanism and Pragmatic
Processes in Lexical Interpretation: the On-line Construction of Concepts.
PhD Thesis.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. 1997 Cognitive and pragmatic aspects of
metonymy. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 6-2: 161-178.
Rumelhart,
D. 1979/1993. Some problems with the notion of literal meanings. In A. Ortony
(ed.) Metaphor and Thought. 71-82.
Sadock, J. 1974. Distinguishing Use from
Meaning. In Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. Academic Press,
INC. New York 97-109
Sadock, J. 1978. On testing for
conversational implicature. in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume
9: Pragmatics, Academic Press, pp. 281-297.
Sadock, J. M. 1972. Speech act idioms. In P. M. Peranteau, J. N. Levi,
and G. C. Phares (eds.). Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the
Sadock, J.M. 1993. Figurative speech and linguistics. In A. Ortony
(ed.) Metaphor and Thought. (2 Ed.) 42-57.
Sandford, 2002. Context, attention, and depth of processing during
interpretation. Mind & Language 17: 188-206
Sandford, A and Sturt, P. 2002. Depth
of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence. Trends
in Cognitive sciences 6 (9): 382-386.
Saussure, F. de. 1975. Course in General Linguistics,
translated from the French (1916) by Wade Baskin. Peter Owen,
Schenider, W. and
Chein, J. 2003. Controlled
and automatic processing: behaviour, theory and biological mechanisms. Cognitive
Science 27: 525-559.
Schneider, W. and Shiffrin, R. 1977. Controlled and automatic human
information processing: I detection, search and attention. Psychological
Review 84: 1-66.
Searle, J. 1979a. Literal meaning. In J.
Searle. Expression and Meaning. 117-136.
Searle, J. 1979b. Metaphor. In Searle, J.
1979. Expression and Meaning. 137-161.
Searle, J. 1980. The background of meaning. In J. Searle et al. (eds.) Speech
Act Theory and Pragmatics. 221-232. Reidel Publishing Co.,
Seuren, P. ?? Lexical meaning and metaphor. Cognition in Language Use.
Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference,
422-431
Shen, Y,. 1987. On the structure and understanding of poetic oxymoron. Poetics Today 8, 105-122.
Shen, Y. 1999. Principles of
metaphor interpretation and the notion of ‘domain’: a proposal for a hybrid
model. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1631-1653
Shiffrin, R.M., and Schneider, W. 1977. Controlled and automatic
information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a
general theory. Psychological Review, 84: 127-190.
Shore, W. J. and V.
Kempe. 1999. The Role of Sentence Context in Accessing Partial Knowledge
of Word Meanings”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol. 28, Nº 2,
pp. 145-163.
Smith, E. and Medin, D. 1981. Categories and Concepts.
Smith, L and Samuelson, L. 1997.
Perceiving and remembering: category stability, variability and development. In
K. Lamberts and D. Shanks (eds.) 1997. Knowledge, Concepts and Categories. 161-196.
Psychology Press,
Smith, S.M., Ward, T.B. and Finke, R.A. (eds.) 1995. The Creative
Cognition Approach. MIT Press,
Song, N.S. 1998. Metaphor and metonymy. In: Relevance Theory.
Applications and Implications. Eds. R. Carston and S. Uchida.
Sperber, D. 1982. Apparently irrational beliefs. In S. Lukes and M.
Hollis (eds.) Rationality and Relativism. 149-180. Blackwell,
Sperber, D. 1989. Lecture on Relevance and Word Meaning, Relevance
Theory Workshop,
Sperber, D. 1990. The epidemiology of beliefs. In C. Fraser and G.
Gaskell (eds.). The Social Psychological Study of Widespread Beliefs.
25-44. Clarendon Press,
Sperber, D. 1994a. The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of
representations. In L. Hirschfield and
Sperber, D. 1994b. Understanding
verbal understanding. In J. Khalfa. What is Intelligence? 179-198.
Sperber, D. 1996. Explaining Culture: a Naturalistic Approach.
Blackwell,
Sperber, D. 1997. Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind and Language 12: 67-83.
Sperber, D. 2000. Metarepresentations in an
evolutionary perspective. In D. Sperber Metarepresentations: an
Interdisciplinary Perspective. 117-137.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1983. Draft of Relevance, chapter 8,
ms. Department of Linguistics, University College London.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1986/1995. Relevance: Communication and
Cognition. Blackwell,
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1987. Précis of Relevance. Behavioral
and Brain Sciences 10 (4): 697-710.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1990. Rhetoric
and relevance. In J. Bender and D. Wellbery. The Ends of Rhetoric:
History, Theory, Practice. 140-155.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1991. Loose talk. In
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1998. The
mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. In P. Carruthers
and J. Boucher (eds.) Thought and Language. 184-200.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 2002. Pragmatics,
modularity and mind-reading. Mind and Language 17(1/2): 3-23.
Sperber, D.
Forthcoming. Modularity
and relevance: how can a massively modular mind be flexible and
context-sensitive? To appear in P. Carruthers,
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre. Forthcoming. Pragmatics.
In F. Jackson and M. Smith (eds.)
Springer, K and Murphy GL. 1992. Feature availability in conceptual
combination. Psychological Science 3: 111-117
Srull,
T.K. and Wyer R.S. 1979. The role of category accessibility in the
interpretation of information about persons: some determinants and
implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37:
1660-1662.
Stefanowitsch,
A. and Gries, S. (Ed.) Forthcoming. Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and
Metonymy. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 171). Berlin and
New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sternberg, R. (ed.) 1999. Handbook of Creativity.
Strässler, J. 1982. Conclusions in Idioms
in English: a Pragmatic Analysis. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Stroop, J.P. 1935.
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental
Psychology 18: 643-662.
Sweetser, Eve 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: The Mind-Body
Metaphor in Semenatic Structure and Semantic Change.
Swinney, D. 1979. Lexical
access during sentence comprehension: (re) consideration of context effects.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 18: 645-659.
Tabossi,
P,
Tabossi, P.
1988. Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts. Journal
of memory and language 27, 324-340
Tabossi, P. 1991. Understanding words in
context. In: G.B. Simpson (ed.) Understanding Word and Sentence. 1-22.
North-Holland: Elsevier Science.
Tabossi, P. 1993. Processing Ambiguous Words in Context. Journal of
Memory and Language, nº 32, pp. 359-372.
Tabossi, P. and Zardon, F. 1993. The activation of idiomatic meaning in spoken language comprehension. In
C. Cacciari and P. Tabossi. (eds.) Idioms: Structure, Processing and
Interpretation. 145-162.
Tendahl, M. 2004. Cognitive effects and effort in a comprehensive theory
of metaphor. Paper presented at Mind, Language and Metaphor conference.
Thomson, D. and Tulving, E. 1970.
Associative encoding and retrieval weak and strong cues. Journal of
experimental psychology vol. 86:255-262.
Titone, D. and
Connine, C. 1994. The comprehension of idiomatic expressions: Effects of
predictability and literality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory and Cognition, 20(5): 1126-1138.
Titone, D. and
Connine, C. 1999. On
the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal
of Pragmatics 31(3): 1655-1674.
Tourangeau, R. and Rips, L. 1991. Interpreting and evaluating metaphors. Journal
of Memory and Language 30: 452-472.
Tourangeau, R. and Sternberg,
R. 1981. Aptness in metaphor. Cognitive Psychology, 13: 27-55.
Tourangeau, R. and Sternberg, R. 1982.
Understanding and appreciating metaphors. Cognition11:
203-244.
Traugott, EC 1985 “Conventional” and “dead” metaphors In
Travis, C. 1985. On what is strictly speaking true. Canadian
Journal of Philosophy 15: 187-229.
Tulving, E. 1979. Relations between
encoding specificity and levels of processing. In L. Cermark and F. Craik
(eds.) Levels of Processing in Human Memory. 405-428.
Tulving, E. 1983. Elements of Episodic Memory.
Tulving, E. 2001. Does memory encoding exists? In M. Naveh-Benjamin,
M. Moscovitch, & h. roediger (eds.) Perspectives on Human Memory and
Cognitive Aging: Essays in Honour of Fergus Craik. 6-27.
Tulving, E. and Thomson, D. 1973. Encoding Specificity and retrieval
processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review 80: 352-373.
Turner, M. 1987.
Death is the Mother of Beauty.
Turner, N. 1998.
Figure. In N. Katz,C. Cacciari, R. Gibbs, M. Turner. 1998. Figurative Language
and Thought. 44-87.
Tvesky, A. 1977.
Features of similarity. Psychological Preview, 84: 327-352.
Unger, C. 1996.
Proverbs and Relevance. Unpublished manuscript
Utsumi, A. 2005. The role of feature emergence in metaphor
appreciation. Metaphor and
Symbol 20 (3): 151-172.
Valle-Tourangeau, Anthony et al 1998 Strategies for generating
multiple instances of common and ad hoc categories ??
Van de Voort, M. and
Vonk, W. 1995. You don’t die immediately when you kick and empty bucket: a
processing view on semantic and syntactic characteristic of idioms. In M.
Everaert et al. (eds.) Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives.
283-300.
Van Lancker, D. and
Canter, G.J. 1981. Idiomatic versus literal interpretations of ditropically
ambiguous sentences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 24: 64-69.
Van Oostendorp, H. & de Mul, S. 1990. Moses beats Adam: a semantic
relatedness effect on a semantic illusion. Acta psychologica 74: 35-46
van Rooy, R. 2001. Relevance of communicative acts. To appear
in Proceedings of Tark 2001
van Rooy, R. 2000. Decision problems in pragmatics.
Ms. ILLC,
Veale, T. 1999. Pragmatic forces in metaphor use: the mechanism of
blend recruitment in visual metaphors. In C. Nehaniv (ed.) Computation for
Metaphors, Ananlogy, and Agents. 37-51.
Vega
Vega
Vega
Vega
Verschueren, Jef, Jan-Ola Ostman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen,
eds. (1997), Handbook of Pragmatics Online, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Vicente, B. 1992. Metaphor, meaning and comprehension.
Pragmatics 2: 49-62.
Vicente, B. 1993.
En torno a la semántica y la pragmática de la metáfora: una revisión crítica. Pragmalingüística,
1: 307-334.
Vicente, B. 1995.
Mecanismos Semántico-Pragmáticos en el Análisis de la Metáfora.
Universidad del País Vasco, Servicio de Publicaciones, País Vasco.
Vicente, B. 1995.
Metaphoric Combinations and the Structure of Concepts”. In Memoriam HENRY SWEET. (pp. 183-190) A. Leon Sendra
& V. Lopez Folgado (Eds.).Córdoba: Servicio de publicaciones de la
Universidad de Córdoba.
Vicente, B. 1996. On the semantics and pragmatics of metaphor: coming
full circle. Language and Literature 5: 195-208.
Vosniadou, S. and Ortony, A. 1989.
Similarity and analogical reasoning: a synthesis. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony
(eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning.
Ward, T., Smith, S. and Vaid, J. (eds.) 1997. Creative Thought: an
Investigation of Conceptual Structure and Processes. American Psychological
Association,
Ward,
T.B., Finke, R.A. & Smith, SM: 1995. Creativity and the Mind:
Discovering the Genius Within.
Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M., Finke, R.A. 1999 Creative
Cognition, in Handbook of creativity, Sternberg, R.J., ed, Cambridge,
Ward, Thomas. B., Smith, Steven. M. & Vaid, Jyotsna. 1997.
Conceptual structures and processes in creative thought In Ward, T. B. Et al.
(eds.). 1997. Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structures
and Processes.
Wasow, T., Sag,
Wharton, T. 2004. Lexical acquisition and pragmatics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 323-342.
Williamson, T. 1994. Vagueness. Routledge,
Wilson,
D. 1995. Is
there a maxim of truthfulness? UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7:
197-212.
Wilson, D.
1996. Pragmatics.
Entry in A. Kuper & J. Kuper (eds) The Social Science Encyclopedia
– 2nd Edition. Routledge,
Wilson, D.
1998. Discourse,
coherence and relevance: A reply to Rachel Giora. Journal of Pragmatics 29:
57-74.
Wilson, D. 1998. Linguistic
structure and inferential communication. In B. Caron (ed.) Proceedings
of the 16th International Congress of Linguists. Elsevier Sciences,
Wilson, D.
1999. Relevance
and Relevance Theory. Entry in R. Wilson & F. Keil (eds) MIT
Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. MIT Press,
Wilson, D.
2000. Metarepresentation
in linguistic communication. In D. Sperber (ed.) Metarepresentations.
Wilson, D. 2002.
Relevance Theory: from the basics to the cutting edge. ICU Open lectures on
cognitive pragmatics. ICU,
Wilson, D. 2003. Relevance Theory and Lexical Pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica, 15(2): 273-291. Special Issue on Pragmatics and the Lexicon. Reprinted in 2004 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16
Wilson, D. 2004-2005 Concepts. Philosophy of Language/Issues in
Pragmatics lectures, Department of Linguistics, University College London.
Wilson, D.
2005. New
directions for research on pragmatics and modularity. Lingua 115: 1129-
1146. Ealier published in 2003 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 105-127.
Download (pdf)
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1993. Linguistic
form and relevance. Lingua 90,
1-2. Special Issue on Relevance Theory, vol 2: 1-25. Version published in
(1990) UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 95-112
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1981. On Grice’s theory of conversation. In
P. Werth (ed.) Conversation and Discourse. 155-178. Croom Helm,
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1985. On
choosing the context for utterance interpretation. In J. Allwood and
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1990. Outline
of Relevance Theory. Hermes 5: 35-56.
Wilson, D.
and Sperber, D. 1998. Mood and
the analysis of non-declarative sentences. In A. Kasher (ed.) Pragmatics:
Critical concepts. Vol. II. Routledge,
Wilson, D.
and Sperber, D. 1998. Pragmatics
and time. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (eds) Relevance Theory:
Applications and Implications. John Benjamins: 1-22.
Wilson, D.
and Sperber, D. 2002. Truthfulness
and Relevance. Mind 111: 583-632. Version (pdf) published in
(2000) UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 215- 254.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2004. Relevance
Theory. In G. Ward and L. Horn (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics.
Wilson,
Deirdre and Wharton, Tim. Forthcoming. Relevance
and Prosody. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 17
Winner, 1988. The Point of Words: Children’s Understanding of
Metaphor and Irony.
Wisniewski, E.J. 1996. Construal and similarity in concept combination.
Journal of Memory and Language 35: 434-45.
Wisniewski,
E.J. 1997. Conceptual combination: possibilities and aesthetics. In T. Ward, S.
Smith & J. Vaid (Eds.) Creative Thought: an Investigation of conceptual
structures and Processes. 51-81.
Wisniewski, E.J. 1997. When concepts combine. Psychonomic Bulletin
and Review 4, 167-183
Wisniewski, E.J. and
Love, B. 1998. Relations
versus properties in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and
Language 38: 177-202.
Wisniewski,
EJ. And Gentner, D. 1991. On the combinatorial semantics of noun pairs: minor
and major adjustments to meaning. In G.B. Simpson (ed.) Understanding Word
and Sentence. Elsevier Science Publishers,
Wolff, P. and Gentner, D. 2000. Evidence for the role-neutral initial processing of metaphor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 26: 529-541.
Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon.
Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon.
Wray,
A. 2002. The Whole and the Parts. Chapter 1 in Wray Formulaic Language and
the Lexicon.