Alessandro Capone writes on 1/14/2010
>On the contrary, being a Gricean (in a way), I would very much like to
>read something by Speranza.
>The reply was quite disproportionate.
N. Allott wrote on 1/14/2010 7:02:09 A.M.
>It is my duty as administrator to urge contributors to the discussion
>(and to the list more generally) to avoid personal attacks on other
>list members.
If that's what you mean, I do apologise Capone. I don't he thinks ill.
"Disproportionate" has a bad ring to it, and indeed I was not about to send the
reply, mentioning some of my 'publications' and 'unpublications'. I have
zillions of them, and would continue, Deo volente, to contribute the most
relevant remarks. If I can provide a specific quote, I will.
I'm very glad, Nick, you welcome discussion. He writes:
"I welcome the recent discussion on the list. ... I hope that we can
have more discussion now. ... [T]here have been several very
enjoyable discussions. I hope for many more in the future."
Good, and 409 is a good number. Note that it keeps changing. Unless a
poster posts, he or she may lurk and then unsubscribe and we will never know she
or he has been there. She or he may still have learned, and more
imortantly, also people who don't subscribe may learn from the files, in terms of
citation retrieved on the internet a la H. D. White.
When R. Carston was administrating, she would suggest the new listers to
make a query, or something. I don't know if that's your policy. Indeed, it
seems more natural that new subscribers should input when they feel like it.
I have more than on a few occasions expressed my backgrounds and why I'm
interested in Grice. As you see it's a long standing, philosophical,
unaffiliated (unless you count the Swimming-Pool Library, by invitation only)
thing. I expect the usual lister will be either:
-- affiliated and with a full position in his or her field.
I find that many of these may find onlist discussion inappropriate.
I know I WOULD if I were a full time positioned lecturer affiliated
with a uni ("Shouldn't he be grading term papers, and preparing
his classes, anyway?"). With the strength for surviving in those
areas -- publish or perish, never "show your face in relevance-l" --
it's unless they feel touched that they will jump, sort of.
-- students, and I've been one, have a very transitory interest in
the topics they are studying. This may relate to what D. Sperber
called, if I recall his wording in the "push/pull" new year
post, the 'content query' which should be occasional. Meaning,
perhaps that there is a lot online on this, and the question
should be a rather intelligent one to merit the push. I never
make unintelligent queries so I wouldn't know.
-- Personally, I would love to know who of the 409 subscribers
define theirselves as a philosopher. I seem to be the one,
even if "Swimming-Pool Librarian", and "for the Grice Club"
fits me better. Sometimes we get affiliations which are
pretty convoluted or out of, say, Department of Philosophy,
as Grice was, and I see behind that a lot of pressures
to be able to enjoy a discussion on the theoretical
aspects of our field of 'study'.
-- I have dedicated ALL of my posts here to some mention
of Grice, and what HE would have done. Serious students
or members of this list have expressed that a consideration
of Grice's views is valuable per se. I have expertise on
the area, and try to drop a few names or publications
with the main philosophical ideas involved, not to show off
of course, but to get some positive feedback. Philosophy
does not bite, once you bark louder.
-- I'm glad, then, that N. Allot is encouraging discussion. I
will paste D. Speber's post, the item on this to
reconsider. Typically, I cannot find it -- this mailer is bad.
But from what I recall, suggested the aim of the list
to consider a few items "at least not inappropriate". These
included: announcement of publications. I have been
unnauncing unpublications, and find that a post is
a sort of, philosophically, a publication. For this the
discussion by Wittgenstein, on the verb 'publish' is
a gem. When Toulmin was sort of sued for
plagiarism, or it may have been another, Wittgenstein
would retort that all he said in CLASS, even orally,
was a PUBLICATION. The content queries Sperber
expected, would be few or occasional. If there's 409
of us, and not all experts, that not need be the case.
Personally, I would have love more answers to the
queries I recall only myself replying, -- one by
this member on anaphoric co-reference, this recent
one on possessive, and prepositional mismatch.
-- I do get a lot of offlist, and I never push them to post
their interests online, because I don't pressurise
people, but they should know I'm always welcome
to read praise from them. (:))
-- This list has meant a lot to me; and I've made
good friends, and I have been feel useful, as it
transpires in things. So, yes,
It's here for a constructive,
intelligent
provocative
innovative
pretty irrelevant in parts
(we need distraction)
humourous
bibliographically backed
spontaneous
paleo-, or
neo-Gricean
good
list.
J. L. Speranza, Esq.,
For the Grice Club
The Swimming-Pool Library,
At the Villa Speranza
Bordighera, Imperia
Received on Thu Jan 14 13:11:01 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 14 2010 - 13:11:51 GMT