Happy New Year to the list! I guess I cannot resist appending this on my
previous note, and did I thank the editor of LPP for sharing her
'continuation of the topic' with us?
Anyway, I had titled my thing, "Whartoniana" and everyone should be
delighted that the Duke of Wharton indeed noted, some time ago, that cards can
"naturally" mean, and important things, too, like one's destiny in the way of
love. I read from "Whartoniana", a book deposited at the Bodleian and
published in 1717:
"A few Days ago, I took it into my Head to make a
Visit to the celebrated Theresius, in order to
be
informed
of my Destiny."
-- Cfr. Wharton on the Kiparskian factivity of "inform". But, how can you be informed of your destiny unless you are a determinist? -- "—Help thyself to a Seat, said he, my Friend, sit down, and give me thy Hand." -- Cfr. Wharton on digitalisation. -- "He pored on it for a considerable while, cast a Figure," -- Gk. "skhema" as in Grice, WoW, ii, "something of the nature of a FIGURE of speech" -- "said not one Word," -- So this would be strictly, _beyond_ Grice's Studies in the Way of *Words*. -- "but ordered me to return the next Day. His Silence seemed to me very ominous, and" -- a flout of informativeness, almost. Alla Leech, A: We'll all miss Agatha and Cedric. B: We'll all miss Cedric. -- "to portend me no Good; yet I much rather chose to be at once acquainted with my ill Fortune, than to continue longer in a suspenceful Uncertainty." -- For this, cfr. Grice "Intention and Uncertainty", P. B. A. For as Grice knows, Hampshire ("Shropshire", in N. Allott's blog -- but I disagree) and Hart, for all their talent, do overestimate Certainty in their _Mind_ joint paper. -- "I therefore very importunately pressed him to let me know his Reason for giving me no Answer to my Quere." -- But he stopped at that. For otherwise, he could have been reprimanded by his fellow conversationalist to let him know _his_ reason for asking for the reason not to give him no answer to his 'quere', which would lead, to echo Grice, to a pseudo-Schifferian regress. -- "Still the old Cuff was mute, making no manner of Reply," -- But didn't he check for the para-gestural? -- "but reaching a Pack of Cards, sat down by me, and challenged me to play a Game with him at Piquet; the which, heavy-hearted and out of Humour as I was, I could not, nay durst not well refuse. Well.— We cut; he has the Hand; I deal; he takes five, and leaves me three.— I find in my Hand a Quint in Hearts, three Kings, three Knaves, the Queen of Diamonds, and three Spades which I discarded. A promising Game! Great Hopes! But, Morbleu! Not one Ace in the three Cards I took in!— Faith, Madam ; I beg your Pardon for swearing; but it was so cursedly provoking, that I cannot keep my Temper when ever I think of it. Sixty five? says he.— Good.— A Quint to a Knave?— Equal.— He then spreads out upon the Table seven Diamonds. Sixty five are seven, says my Antagonist, very gravely; a Quatorze of Aces, fourteen more. — All good, cries I, with a deep Sigh.— -- In prosodic terms, /ahh/ a suprasegmental sign of _relief_. -- "Diamonds, says he, playing his Ace, twenty-two, and plays out all his Diamonds running.— Down went my Queen, accompanied with two Clubs and four Hearts.— He next plays his Ace of Clubs, and that quite confounds me; for, the most unluckily in the World, I had left my King unguarded. He redoubles upon me with the Ten of Clubs; I fling him a Spade. Next, upon his Ace of Hearts, I give my Knave, still depending upon saving the Lurch, scarce doubting of his having the Queen.— My King of Spades next falls a Victim to his Ace.— But, how was I Thunder-struck! How were all my Hopes blasted! The Devil a Bit of the Queen of Hearts had he, and poor Charles found himself Capoted. I have won the Game, said he.— From hence learn thy Destiny. -- Alla English, but cfr. "Wind in the Willows" for 'learn' meaning "teach". -- "If you must love, pitch upon some Object that is more your Match: For if ever you attack the divine Pallas, you will infallibly be Lurched.— Adieu. Heaven take thee into it’s Protection: Thus we parted." --- Well, don't I have an ear for class! There I was saying that Whartoniana was to echo Edith Wharton, and while the classy Berkshire-based Edith Wharton Society does regularly promote their Whartoniana ("all about Wharton", "Wharton on Wednesdays) when you try "Whartoniana" online and you get, also, a link to this LOVELY digitalised google book, deposited at The Bodleian (across Blackwell, as RT-listers should know!), called archaically appropriately Whartoniana; or, miscellanies, in verse and prose, by the Wharton family,and several other persons of distinction. And it's London 1727, if you must! and it's Wharton, Philip, Duke of Wharton, d. 1731. One of these "other persons of distinction" undoubtedly was Sir Henry St. John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke, for many rush to consult "Whartoniana" for this below: "After his return he wrote an ode called "Almahide", a remonstrance to one of his mistresses upon her infidelity (printed in Whartoniana, 1727, ii. ...) _www.red1st.com/tng603/getperson.php?personID=I1750046432_ (http://www.red1st.com/tng603/getperson.php?personID=I1750046432) ... But this above is possibly irrelevant -- what _is_, according to a friend who systematically misunderstands Sperber's and Wilson's theory says one cannot _be_ irrelevant, if it's a cognitely implanted thing. The language of berkiria whartoniana and clyptomena whartoniana, Lots of google hits, too for a rare Mexican orchid, if you can believe that, whose linguistic alliance is"barkeria whartoniana". So much for the inventor of 'floral dictiveness' (Say it with flowers). There is a type of fern, too, that goes by the species "whartoniana", so he (this Wharton) was really into vegetables. As it relates to the Lady of Berkshire, however it's The Mount's Blog!: The Triumphant Return of Wharton on Wednesdays! 1 Jul 2009 ... They will be collaborating with us and providing the readers for each week's slice of Whartoniana. The first reading is this afternoon (July ... helpsavethemount.blogspot.com/.../triumphant-return-of-wharton-on.html But perhaps the most _relevant_ point has to be what "Whartoniana" includes. An online site says about the tarot cards, which I opened this post with. "[I]n Spain at least, there were professional cartomancers in the 17th century, and they used layouts with multiple cards and positional SIGNIFICATIONS. [cfr. T. Wharton on 'natural/non-natural' meaning] The discovery, in the Whartoniana (1727), shows that diviners could use the play of a regular game as a form of divination. For, indeed, as another online site reads, "Whartoniana" "contained a detailed account of a card game that resulted in a divination. In the Table of Contents the piece is titled “To the lovely PALLAS, Or the Game at Picquet.”" Wharton takes Grice to task. As Martinich has noted (in his _Dialectica_ essay) it is controversial that one of Grice's examples _travel_ The present budget means-N that we will have a hard year. I think it does travel, since, well, 'mean' is a classy colloquialism, and it should be scare-quoted anyways (sic): The present budget 'means' that we will have a hard year Note Wharton's caution also that it _might_ be said things like "the present budget means will have a hard year". Might be said by people who either scare-quote or prosodically otherwise mark any flout of 'animism'. The cards of the Game of Picquet thus therefore exploit the same scare-quotedness of how the positional SIGNIFICATION of this or that Queen of Diamonds 'means' that you'll love life is, if you have to be informed and you'll learn, _meant_ to be, indeed, very GOOD! Cheers, J. L. Speranza for the Grice Club Cheers, JLSReceived on Thu Dec 31 20:00:20 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 31 2009 - 20:01:39 GMT