Just forwarding this message I received via cogling in case anyone is
interested.
Best wishes,
Billy
------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 10:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jarno Raukko <raukko@ling.helsinki.fi>
Subject: workshop "On the necessity of experimental methods
in semantics"
To: cogling@ucsd.edu
Send reply to: Jarno Raukko <raukko@ling.helsinki.fi>
Workshop "On the Necessity of Experimental Methods in Semantics"
at the 20th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics,
Helsinki, Finland, January 7-9, 2004
Including organized debates, short talks, and discussion.
Organized by Jarno Raukko (Dept. of English, University of Helsinki)
and Ulla Vanhatalo (Dept. of Finno-Ugrian Studies, University of
Helsinki).
Submission deadline: Friday, September 12, 2003
There seems to be growing interest in using experimental and
questionnaire-based methods in semantic studies, as witnessed by,
e.g., the program of the 8th Internat'l Cognitive Linguistics
Conference (Spain, July 2003). On the one hand, this follows a
tradition of psycholinguists' expansion on 'higher' levels of
language. On the other, semanticians have been looking for different
alternatives to broaden their scope of discovery procedures and
analytical tools. In the latter vein, the search for informant-based
experimental evidence can also be compared with, e.g., approaches to
computational experiments and corpus applications.
We wish to think of experiments not exclusively belonging to the
domain of psycholinguistics. With 'experimental' we refer to several
kinds of methods that rely on the (population of) language speaker(s)
as an active and creative source of information in tailored and
administered settings. Thus, we would welcome discussion not only on
psycholinguistic laboratory experiments, but also methods such as
questionnaires, elicitation tests, follow-up studies, and interview -
and possibilities for ecological validity, holistic settings, and
increasing informant-centeredness in the methodology.
The need for experimental methods primarily grows out of shortcomings
of other methods to tackle many research questions in the field of
semantics. For instance, delicate differences between near-synonyms
are ultimately out of the reach of even the finest corpora. Or, as
another example, if you are interested in how to divide the senses of
a polysemous word, only informants performing controlled sorting (and
other) tasks can give you insight into people's semantic intuitions,
e.g., on meaning similarity and meaning difference.
More generally, the necessity for informant-centered methods grows
out
of the nature of meaning making: as speakers conceptualize the world
through their bodily perception and social interaction, they also end
up being the experts in telling the researcher about the ways of
language. Also, such phenomena as semantic disagreements are well
accounted for in experimental studies.
However, we appreciate differences of opinion not only in people's
semantics, but within the realm of linguists. Instead of only
suggesting to our audience that experiments must be seen as a
necessity, the workshop invites both proponents and critics (and
sceptics). While doing this, the aim is to tackle the foundation of
semantic studies and further enhance the match between research
questions, tacit assumptions, and methods.
This workshop invites researchers to talk about different approaches
to the experimental investigation of meaning, and to the necessity of
this endeavor. This topic hopefully intrigues people from various
disciplines, e.g., semantics, cognitive linguistics, lexicography,
psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, social psychology, variation
studies, anthropological linguistics, field linguistics, folk
linguistics, and language acquisition. Unconventional approaches are
especially welcome.
We welcome contributions no matter whether they are based on
completed
work, work in progress, or ideational and programmatic turns.
Possible
topics can include (but are not limited to) 7 Example experiments
(e.g., word meanings; polysemy; synonymy; lexical
fields; discourse meanings) and their necessity to the research
question
7 Discussion / comparison of relevant / possible techniques
7 Methodological and philosophical views on the matter
7 Applications that could exploit experimental semantic models /
results
(e.g., pedagogy, lexicography) and thus show their necessity
We would like to ask you to submit your short abstract (about half a
page, in English) by e-mail to us by Friday, September 12, 2003. In
this abstract, we would like at least a statement of your main point,
and a note on whether you might want to give a short presentation or
participate in a debate or discussion. Please remember that we would
like to keep the workshop focused on the "necessity (or non-
necessity)
of experimental methods in semantic studies".
Please note that workshop participants need to register for the
conference in usual fashion. Registration starts on October 1. We
will
inform participants of the program of the workshop by September 30,
and the official conference program will be announced on October 30
on
the conference website at www.ling.helsinki.fi/kielitiede/20scl.html
Send your abstracts and possible questions concerning the workshop
to:
jarno.raukko@helsinki.fi
ulla.vanhatalo@helsinki.fi
*** We apologize for possible multiple copies of this message. ***
------- End of forwarded message -------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 09 2003 - 12:35:16 GMT