The limits of multilingualismlast changed 11 Jan 2012
IntroductionThis page is a collection of information about the extremes of multilingualism, both individual and societal. It tries to establish an upper limit for the number of languages that:
It reflects an amateur interest that I have had for some years rather than a serious research agenda; so most of my data comes from inquiries among colleagues rather than trawling the literature. Even so it may interest others who have time and ability to take the questions more seriously. A particularly encouraging example is Michael Erard, who has written an article about hyperpolyglots in the New Scientist and a popular book about them called 'Babel No More'.
One reason for my interest lies in what we can learn about the human mind from these extreme cases. Where an entire society speaks (say) six languages, we may assume that this society is genetically just like any other society, so it demonstrates that the human mind (barring pathology) is capable of learning and handling this many languages. This shows how important it is for any theory of cognition and language to be able to accommodate more than one language. Individual extreme polyglots (who I have called 'hyperpolyglots') are important for obvious reasons: if we knew how they managed these apparently impossible intellectual feats, the rest of us might be able to learn from them. Moreover, the research evidence seems to show that bilingualism has positive side-effects on the rest of cognition, so I hope these examples of supreme achievement will help to encourage the rest of us to do better. Individual multilingualism: hyperpolyglots
Living hyperpolyglots
Societal multilingualism: hyperdiglossia
|